Comment on Black's (1993) article, 'Comparing genuine and simulated suicide notes: A new perspective.'

Gary M. Diamond, D. Laurence More, Aminta G. Hawkins, Emil Soucar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

The recent article by Stephen T. Black (see record [rid]1993-45704-001[/rid]) comparing genuine suicide notes with simulated notes is examined here. This article corrected a sampling error made in the original study by E. S. Shneidman and N. Farberow (1957), but Black's design suffers from theoretical and methodological problems that render it uninterpretable: First, no theoretical background is elaborated, and no hypotheses are offered. Second, no constructs are operationalized, and no predictions are tested. In the present article, the operational design is critiqued, and then it is suggested that the study of suicide notes in this fashion should cease. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
Original languageEnglish GB
Pages (from-to)46-48
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Volume63
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 1995

Keywords

  • Content Analysis
  • Suicide
  • Written Communication
  • Humans
  • Writing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on Black's (1993) article, 'Comparing genuine and simulated suicide notes: A new perspective.''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this