Comment on 'Visualizing high-temperature spin dynamics in La 1-xCaxMnO3 from a mapping of EPR linewidth and g factor'

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

In a recent paper (Liu et al 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 196213), Liu et al reported measurements of the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) of polycrystalline La1-xCaxMnO3 (LCMO) manganites, and a study of the temperature and concentration (x) dependences of the EPR signal parameters. In particular, the authors claimed notable asymmetry of the paramagnetic (PM) linewidth ΔHpp and g factor versus x. It is suggested in this comment that such a claim seems to be wrong as regards the PM g factor for the LCMO system. The reason for the above noted invalid conclusion of Liu et al may be the use of an inadequate method for extracting PM g factor values. It is noted that real electron-hole doping asymmetry manifests itself in, e.g., low-temperature behavior of the resonance signal intensity in accordance with the LCMO phase diagram. Numerous uncertainties and obscurities are also characteristic of the paper commented on.

Original languageEnglish
Article number058001
JournalJournal of Physics Condensed Matter
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 6 Feb 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Materials Science
  • Condensed Matter Physics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on 'Visualizing high-temperature spin dynamics in La 1-xCaxMnO3 from a mapping of EPR linewidth and g factor''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this