Comments and authors' reply on "Linear stress-strain relations in nonlinear elasticity" by A. Chiskis and R. Parnes, (Acta Mech. 146, 109-113, 2001)

Konstantin Volokh, A. Chiskis, R. Parnes

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recently this journal published a work stating that the idea of geometrical nonlinearity within Hooke's law is "no more than a widely accepted illusion since the linear stress-strain laws hold only for very nontrivial measures representing the corresponding strain tensor which depend on material parameters". Since the linear stress-strain relations with nonlinear strains are, indeed, widely used in research and design the arguments of the authors of this work should be considered. Below it is shown where a flaw in these arguments is and why Hooke's law with nonlinear strains is correct.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-245
Number of pages5
JournalActa Mechanica
Volume171
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comments and authors' reply on "Linear stress-strain relations in nonlinear elasticity" by A. Chiskis and R. Parnes, (Acta Mech. 146, 109-113, 2001)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this