TY - GEN
T1 - Comparison between normalizations for SVM-GMM supervectors speaker verification
AU - Simon, Udi Ben
AU - Lapidot, Itshak
AU - Guterman, Hugo
PY - 2010/12/1
Y1 - 2010/12/1
N2 - This paper presents a comparison between several features normalization methods, and a comparison between different types of Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) based supervectors normalizations for robust Speaker Verification. We implemented the methods of normalizations as a part of speaker verification system using Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier and GMM-based supervectors. When implementing the speaker recognition system, we used Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) feature extraction. A valid question is which features normalization to use, if any. We examine the most common methods of feature normalizations, such as: Feature Warping mapping, and Cepstral Mean Subtraction (CMS) normalization with and without variance normalization. These methods were compared to features without normalization at all, and to a basic [-1, 1] normalization. In addition, we applied few types of normalizations to the GMM-mean supervectors, in order to improve the performance of the SVM classifier. All comparisons of the speaker verification system had been done in terms of DET curve, EER (Equal Error Rate) and Min.DCF. The best results we achieved were on combined supervector normalizations of Universal Background Model (UBM) Standard Deviation (STD) and [-1, 1] normalization. The type of the MFCC normalization has no big influence on the verification performance. The best results were: EER about 5.0% and MIN.DCF of 0.02.
AB - This paper presents a comparison between several features normalization methods, and a comparison between different types of Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) based supervectors normalizations for robust Speaker Verification. We implemented the methods of normalizations as a part of speaker verification system using Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier and GMM-based supervectors. When implementing the speaker recognition system, we used Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) feature extraction. A valid question is which features normalization to use, if any. We examine the most common methods of feature normalizations, such as: Feature Warping mapping, and Cepstral Mean Subtraction (CMS) normalization with and without variance normalization. These methods were compared to features without normalization at all, and to a basic [-1, 1] normalization. In addition, we applied few types of normalizations to the GMM-mean supervectors, in order to improve the performance of the SVM classifier. All comparisons of the speaker verification system had been done in terms of DET curve, EER (Equal Error Rate) and Min.DCF. The best results we achieved were on combined supervector normalizations of Universal Background Model (UBM) Standard Deviation (STD) and [-1, 1] normalization. The type of the MFCC normalization has no big influence on the verification performance. The best results were: EER about 5.0% and MIN.DCF of 0.02.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651245519&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/EEEI.2010.5662140
DO - 10.1109/EEEI.2010.5662140
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:78651245519
SN - 9781424486809
T3 - 2010 IEEE 26th Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel, IEEEI 2010
SP - 621
EP - 625
BT - 2010 IEEE 26th Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel, IEEEI 2010
T2 - 2010 IEEE 26th Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel, IEEEI 2010
Y2 - 17 November 2010 through 20 November 2010
ER -