Comparison of Generalized Lambda Distribution (GLD) and Response Modeling Methodology (RMM) as general platforms for distribution fitting

Distribution fitting is widely practiced in all branches of engineering and applied science, yet only a few studies have examined the relative capability of various parameter-rich families of distributions to represent a wide spectrum of diversely shaped distributions. In this article, two such families of distributions, Generalized Lambda Distribution (GLD) and Response Modeling Methodology (RMM), are compared. For a sample of some commonly used distributions, each family is fitted to each distribution, using two methods: fitting by minimization of the L2 norm (minimizing density function distance) and nonlinear regression applied to a sample of exact quantile values (minimizing quantile function distance). The resultant goodness-of-fit is assessed by four criteria: the optimized value of the L2 norm, and three additional criteria, relating to quantile function matching. Results show that RMM is uniformly better than GLD. An additional study includes Shore's quantile function (QF) and again RMM is the best performer, followed by Shore's QF and then GLD.