TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of hydrogen effects on additively manufactured and conventional austenitic steels
AU - Nietzke, Jonathan
AU - Konert, Florian
AU - Poka, Konstantin
AU - Merz, Benjamin
AU - Sobol, Oded
AU - Böllinghaus, Thomas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - Hydrogen and its derivatives are promising energy carriers for future renewable energy supplies. Austenitic stainless steels, such as AISI 316L, are commonly used in hydrogen transportation systems. While often thought to be resistant to hydrogen embrittlement, studies have shown that 316L is susceptible under certain conditions. As demand for hydrogen applications grows, additive manufacturing (AM) technologies offer design flexibility and customisation benefits. However, data on AM parts behaviour in hydrogen environments is lacking. This study investigates the influence of hydrogen on mechanical properties using slow strain rate testing (SSRT) on conventional AISI 304L, 316L and AM 316L specimens. The results indicate a greater effect of hydrogen on 304L compared to 316L, with AM 316L showing increased susceptibility. However, the ductility of AM 316L remains comparable to conventional 316L due to its initial ductility. The study provides insights into the performance of conventional and AM austenitic stainless steels in gaseous hydrogen environments.
AB - Hydrogen and its derivatives are promising energy carriers for future renewable energy supplies. Austenitic stainless steels, such as AISI 316L, are commonly used in hydrogen transportation systems. While often thought to be resistant to hydrogen embrittlement, studies have shown that 316L is susceptible under certain conditions. As demand for hydrogen applications grows, additive manufacturing (AM) technologies offer design flexibility and customisation benefits. However, data on AM parts behaviour in hydrogen environments is lacking. This study investigates the influence of hydrogen on mechanical properties using slow strain rate testing (SSRT) on conventional AISI 304L, 316L and AM 316L specimens. The results indicate a greater effect of hydrogen on 304L compared to 316L, with AM 316L showing increased susceptibility. However, the ductility of AM 316L remains comparable to conventional 316L due to its initial ductility. The study provides insights into the performance of conventional and AM austenitic stainless steels in gaseous hydrogen environments.
KW - Additive manufacturing
KW - Austenitic steel
KW - Hollow specimen
KW - Hydrogen embrittlement
KW - Slow strain rate testing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208389973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.109042
DO - 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.109042
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85208389973
SN - 1350-6307
VL - 167
JO - Engineering Failure Analysis
JF - Engineering Failure Analysis
M1 - 109042
ER -