Comparison of hydrogen effects on additively manufactured and conventional austenitic steels

Jonathan Nietzke, Florian Konert, Konstantin Poka, Benjamin Merz, Oded Sobol, Thomas Böllinghaus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Hydrogen and its derivatives are promising energy carriers for future renewable energy supplies. Austenitic stainless steels, such as AISI 316L, are commonly used in hydrogen transportation systems. While often thought to be resistant to hydrogen embrittlement, studies have shown that 316L is susceptible under certain conditions. As demand for hydrogen applications grows, additive manufacturing (AM) technologies offer design flexibility and customisation benefits. However, data on AM parts behaviour in hydrogen environments is lacking. This study investigates the influence of hydrogen on mechanical properties using slow strain rate testing (SSRT) on conventional AISI 304L, 316L and AM 316L specimens. The results indicate a greater effect of hydrogen on 304L compared to 316L, with AM 316L showing increased susceptibility. However, the ductility of AM 316L remains comparable to conventional 316L due to its initial ductility. The study provides insights into the performance of conventional and AM austenitic stainless steels in gaseous hydrogen environments.

Original languageEnglish
Article number109042
JournalEngineering Failure Analysis
Volume167
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Additive manufacturing
  • Austenitic steel
  • Hollow specimen
  • Hydrogen embrittlement
  • Slow strain rate testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Materials Science
  • General Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of hydrogen effects on additively manufactured and conventional austenitic steels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this