Comparison of linear predictors obtained by data transformation, Generalized Linear Models (GLM) and response modeling methodology (RMM)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The data-transformation approach and generalized linear modeling both require specification of a transformation prior to deriving the linear predictor (LP). By contrast, response modeling methodology (RMM) requires no such specifications. Furthermore, RMM effectively decouples modeling of the LP from modeling its relationship to the response. It may therefore be of interest to compare LPs obtained by the three approaches. Based on numerical quality problems that have appeared in the literature, these approaches are compared in terms of both the derived structure of the LPs and goodness-of-fit statistics. The relative advantages of RMM are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)389-399
Number of pages11
JournalQuality and Reliability Engineering International
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2008

Keywords

  • Canonical correlation analysis
  • Generalized linear models
  • Linear regression
  • Normalizing transformation
  • Response modeling methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of linear predictors obtained by data transformation, Generalized Linear Models (GLM) and response modeling methodology (RMM)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this