Conclusions: Over-regulation or under-regulation?

Eyal Tevet, Varda Shiffer, Itzhak Galnoor

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

The concluding chapter addresses three underlying issues that appeared frequently in the articles and the cases in the book. First, the expectation, and indeed requirement, that regulation would balance conflicting values. The value most challenged in many cases is the public interest, which has to be balanced with conflicting values such as-the sector's stability, or the shareholders' interests. Second, the issue of centralized or decentralized mechanisms of regulation-bottom-up or top-down. In many of the cases, both mechanisms operate side by side, often without proper coordination. Third, the quest for new regulatory tools, especially such arrangements-formal or agreed upon-that involve the regulated bodies or the public at large. It was found that such tools do increase trust and could render regulation more effective. In general, regulation could benefit from a more comprehensive policy design, new methods and tools, and coherence among the regulatory agencies.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRegulation in Israel
Subtitle of host publicationValues, Effectiveness, Methods
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages239-252
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9783030562472
ISBN (Print)9783030562465
DOIs
StatePublished - 14 Dec 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Centralization-Decentralization
  • Conflicting values
  • Regulation methods
  • Trust

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conclusions: Over-regulation or under-regulation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this