TY - JOUR
T1 - Confronting minorization
T2 - colonial missionaries and Ottoman millets in the eyes of a Nineteenth Century Baghdadi Rabbi
AU - Tzoreff, Avi ram
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 British Society for Middle Eastern Studies.
PY - 2023/1/1
Y1 - 2023/1/1
N2 - Following the Tanzimat reforms in 1839 the Ottoman Mashriq crystallized as a contact zone where different understandings of the reforms, citizenship, and collective identifications evaluated. While the European colonial powers enhanced an individualized understanding of religion and religious difference, the discourse that was enhanced by the Sublime Porte emphasized the meaning of the reforms as a component in the attempt to maintain the unification of the empire as a political unit, securing the various collective centers of identification of Ottoman citizens through the millet system. These discourses were reflected in various understandings of the local communities of their own status within the developing political framework. This article examines this contact zone through the discussion of the writings of one of the prominent figures of the Baghdadi Jewish community–R. Yosef Hayyim (1834-1909)–and the various ways in which he depicted the contested discourses of ”modernity”, citizenship and autonomy. While Hayyim negated the European emancipatoric model, which was resulted in the act of ”minorization” of the Jews, he adopted, though hesitantly, the Ottoman model of the Tanzimat. He saw this model as one that confronted the individualized understanding of religious difference and therefore guaranteed a certain degree of communal autonomy.
AB - Following the Tanzimat reforms in 1839 the Ottoman Mashriq crystallized as a contact zone where different understandings of the reforms, citizenship, and collective identifications evaluated. While the European colonial powers enhanced an individualized understanding of religion and religious difference, the discourse that was enhanced by the Sublime Porte emphasized the meaning of the reforms as a component in the attempt to maintain the unification of the empire as a political unit, securing the various collective centers of identification of Ottoman citizens through the millet system. These discourses were reflected in various understandings of the local communities of their own status within the developing political framework. This article examines this contact zone through the discussion of the writings of one of the prominent figures of the Baghdadi Jewish community–R. Yosef Hayyim (1834-1909)–and the various ways in which he depicted the contested discourses of ”modernity”, citizenship and autonomy. While Hayyim negated the European emancipatoric model, which was resulted in the act of ”minorization” of the Jews, he adopted, though hesitantly, the Ottoman model of the Tanzimat. He saw this model as one that confronted the individualized understanding of religious difference and therefore guaranteed a certain degree of communal autonomy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177031285&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13530194.2023.2279333
DO - 10.1080/13530194.2023.2279333
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85177031285
SN - 1353-0194
JO - British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies
JF - British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies
ER -