Constructive and mechanised meta-theory of IEL and similar modal logics

Christian Hagemeier, Dominik Kirst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Artemov and Protopopescu proposed intuitionistic epistemic logic (IEL) to capture an intuitionistic conception of knowledge. By establishing completeness, they provided the base for a meta-theoretic investigation of IEL, which was continued by Krupski with a proof of cut-elimination, and Su and Sano establishing semantic cut-elimination and the finite model property. However, no analysis of these results in a constructive meta-logic has been conducted, arguably impeding the intuitionistic justification of IEL. We aim to close this gap and investigate IEL in the constructive-type theory of the Coq proof assistant. Concretely, we present a constructive and mechanised completeness proof for IEL, employing a syntactic decidability proof based on cut-elimination to constructivise the ideas from the literature. Following Su and Sano, we then also give constructive versions of semantic cut-elimination and the finite model property. Given our constructive and mechanised setting, all these results now bear executable algorithms. Our particular strategy to establish constructive completeness exploiting syntactic decidability can be used for similar modal logics, which we illustrate with the examples of the classical modal logics K, D and T. For modal logics including the four axioms, however, the method seems not to apply immediately.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1585-1610
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Logic and Computation
Volume32
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • completeness
  • constructive mathematics
  • epistemic logic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Theoretical Computer Science
  • Software
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Logic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Constructive and mechanised meta-theory of IEL and similar modal logics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this