Abstract
Although leaders value ethics and morality they frequently (mis)behave. Recent work suggests that unethical behavior is caused by ‘ethical blind spots’ - biases that make leaders pay little (or no) attention to their wrongdoings. But what causes blind spots? When do they emerge? And most importantly, can we reduce them? Here, we review literature on attention, psychology, and behavioral ethics to answer these questions. Overall, the research suggests that context corrupts: In ambiguous - where ambiguity serves as a justification for wrongdoings - and tempting situations, many well-intentioned people quickly focus on what’s unethical wrong (but self-serving more profitable) at the expenses on what is ethical right (yet less profitable). This shift of attention makes leaders ethically blind. We conclude by suggesting possible interventions to fight blind spots and encourage future research to adopt a multidisciplinary approach to help leaders exercise good moral judgment and foster ethical climates.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Judgment and Leadership |
| Subtitle of host publication | A Multidisciplinary Approach to Concepts, Practice, and Development |
| Publisher | Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. |
| Pages | 130-144 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781839104107 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781839104091 |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
- General Business, Management and Accounting
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Context corrupts: What makes leaders fail to see their (mis)behaviors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver