Abstract
We give a unified overview of the study of the effects of additional set theoretic axioms on quotient structures. Our focus is on rigidity, measured in terms of existence (or rather non-existence) of suitably non-trivial automorphisms of the quotients in question. A textbook example for the study of this topic is the Boolean algebra P(N)/ Fin, whose behavior is the template around which this survey revolves: Forcing axioms imply that all of its automorphisms are trivial, in the sense that they are induced by almost permutations of N, while under the Continuum Hypothesis this rigidity fails and P(N)/ Fin admits uncountably many non-trivial automorphisms. We consider far-reaching generalisations of this phenomenon and present a wide variety of situations where analogous patterns persist, focusing mainly (but not exclusively) on the categories of Boolean algebras, Čech–Stone remainders, and C∗-algebras. We survey the state of the art and the future prospects of this field, discussing the major open problems and outlining the main ideas of the proofs whenever possible.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 195-287 |
| Number of pages | 93 |
| Journal | Bulletin of Symbolic Logic |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jun 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Calkin algebra
- P(N)/Fin
- Ulam-stability
- continuum hypothesis
- corona rigidity
- forcing axioms
- uniform Roe coronas
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy
- Logic