TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost-benefit analysis of risperidone and clozapine in the treatment of schizophrenia in Israel
AU - Ginsberg, Gary
AU - Shani, Segev
AU - Lev, Boaz
N1 - Funding Information:
We wish to acknowledge the work of the Israeli Psychiatric Case Register, under the supervision of the late Ms Miriam Popper, in providing background utilisation information for this study. In addition, we wish to acknowledge the help of Professor E. Davidson of Sheba Hospital, Professor B. Lehrer of Hadassah University Hospital, Professor H. Bellmaker of Beer-Sheva Psychiatric Hospital and Dr Y. Lerner of the Falk Institute, Jerusalem. This study was carried out by salaried employees of the Israeli Ministry of Health as part of their routine workload. Any views expressed by the authors are not necessarily those of the Ministry of Health.
PY - 1998/1/1
Y1 - 1998/1/1
N2 - In this study, the benefits and costs of treating schizophrenia with either risperidone or clozapine were examined. The lifetime drug-treatment cost incurred by a patient with schizophrenia in Israel was $US7561 (1996 values) with an initial 6-month trial with risperidone, compared with $US6326 with clozapine and $US3360 with typical antipsychotics. Total lifetime costs of psychiatric health services (excluding medications) by individuals who were continuously receiving typical antipsychotics were $US 181 555 per patient. Assuming a 6.3% decrease in hospital use with typical antipsychotics and an absolute 30% decrease with risperidone or clozapine, the use of clozapine or risperidone reduced hospitalisation costs by $US7159 per patient, but increased community-care costs by $US1627 per patient, giving health-service benefit: cost ratios of 1.87 : 1 and 1.32 : 1, respectively. After adding indirect benefits resulting from increased work productivity (minus indirect costs related to increases in transport costs because of visits for blood monitoring during clozapine therapy), the benefit : cost ratios increased to 2.04 : 1 and 1.48 : 1, respectively. Assuming that clozapine caused a 30% decrease in hospital use by patients with new-onset schizophrenia, risperidone would have to decrease hospital use by 43.2% (i.e. a 13.2% relative advantage) for its societal benefits to justify its increased costs.
AB - In this study, the benefits and costs of treating schizophrenia with either risperidone or clozapine were examined. The lifetime drug-treatment cost incurred by a patient with schizophrenia in Israel was $US7561 (1996 values) with an initial 6-month trial with risperidone, compared with $US6326 with clozapine and $US3360 with typical antipsychotics. Total lifetime costs of psychiatric health services (excluding medications) by individuals who were continuously receiving typical antipsychotics were $US 181 555 per patient. Assuming a 6.3% decrease in hospital use with typical antipsychotics and an absolute 30% decrease with risperidone or clozapine, the use of clozapine or risperidone reduced hospitalisation costs by $US7159 per patient, but increased community-care costs by $US1627 per patient, giving health-service benefit: cost ratios of 1.87 : 1 and 1.32 : 1, respectively. After adding indirect benefits resulting from increased work productivity (minus indirect costs related to increases in transport costs because of visits for blood monitoring during clozapine therapy), the benefit : cost ratios increased to 2.04 : 1 and 1.48 : 1, respectively. Assuming that clozapine caused a 30% decrease in hospital use by patients with new-onset schizophrenia, risperidone would have to decrease hospital use by 43.2% (i.e. a 13.2% relative advantage) for its societal benefits to justify its increased costs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031890217&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2165/00019053-199813020-00006
DO - 10.2165/00019053-199813020-00006
M3 - Article
C2 - 10178649
AN - SCOPUS:0031890217
SN - 1170-7690
VL - 13
SP - 231
EP - 241
JO - PharmacoEconomics
JF - PharmacoEconomics
IS - 2
ER -