Abstract
Restoration of rivers is important because they provide many ecosystem services. However, full restoration is costly, and with limited resources, the priority of the different elements of a restoration plan needs to be considered. In this article the benefits of separable restoration components were analyzed for the Kishon River in Israel. The proposed restoration plan contained four segments: riverbed cleaning, ecological restoration, accessibility, and sports facilities. We used non-market valuation to estimate benefits and found the full restoration programme to pass the cost–benefit test, but partial restoration to be more efficient. Based on these conclusions, different funding alternatives are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 871-890 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | International Journal of Water Resources Development |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 3 Sep 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Keywords
- Israel
- Urban river restoration
- contingent valuation
- cost-benefit analysis
- travel cost
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Development
- Water Science and Technology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cost–benefit analysis of full and partial river restoration: the Kishon River in Israel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver