Cultural rights or human rights: The case of female genital mutilation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations


The Women's International Conference in 1995 in Beijing proposed the idea that women's rights be considered within the category of general human rights. Our concepts about human rights are rooted in the liberal traditions of a relatively homogeneous Western culture. In recent years, however, this culture has become increasingly heterogeneous. As a result of this greater diversity of beliefs and subcultures, some interesting challenges to these liberal traditions have arisen. An example of where such challenge elicits particularly divergent views is the issue of female genital mutilation, where the social and cultural rights of various subgroups appear to conflict with concepts concerning the human rights of an individual. Thus, this issue challenges a number of beliefs, including aspects of multiculturalism and feminism. In this article, I first examine the problem of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) within the context of multiculturalism, with particular emphasis upon feminism of women of color. Additionally, two opposing positions within the liberal multicultural approach - that of Kymlicka versus that of Kukathas - are then examined critically, and several rapprochements are offered. A final section focuses upon the implications of these issues for feminist women of color.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)339-348
Number of pages10
JournalSex Roles
Issue number5-6
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2004


  • Female genital mutilation
  • Human rights
  • Women rights

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology


Dive into the research topics of 'Cultural rights or human rights: The case of female genital mutilation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this