TY - JOUR
T1 - Defective induction of antigen‐reactive proliferating T cells in B cell‐deprived mice II. Anti‐μ treatment affects the initiation and recruitment of T cells
AU - Ron, Yacov
AU - De Baetselier, Patrick
AU - Tzehoval, Esther
AU - Gordon, Julius
AU - Feldman, Michael
AU - Segal, Shraga
PY - 1983/1/1
Y1 - 1983/1/1
N2 - Mice injected from day of birth onwards with rabbit anti‐mouse IgM (anti‐μ) antibodies were found to be B cell‐deficient and defective for the induction of antigen‐reactive proliferating T cells (TPRLF). This defective induction was not due to the absence of circulating antigen‐specific antibodies since the daily injections of such antibodies during exposure to antigen did not restore the ability of anti‐IgM treated animals to generate TPRLF. Analyzing the cellular events implicated in the induction of virgin antigen‐reactive T cells, anti‐μ‐treated mice manifested impairment of the three interacting cell types involved in the induction of TPRLF. Thus, peritoneal and splenic antigen‐presenting cells from such animals were impaired in their capacity to signal a primary antigen‐specific T cell reaction. Their splenic lymphocytes could not function as initiator cells in transferring immunogenic signals to recruit TPRLF in normal recipients. Potent antigen‐specific splenic initiator cells failed to induce the recruitment of specific TPRLF in anti‐μ‐treated mice. The defective induction of TPRLF in anti‐μ‐treated mice may be due to a functional impairment of cells expressing membranebound IgM molecules which seemingly play a central role in the transfer of immunogenic signals for the recruitment of antigen‐specific circulating T cells. We suggest that splenic B cells function as initiators in the transfer of antigen‐induced signals from peritoneal antigen‐presenting cells to T cells. These seems to be the primary targets of anti‐μ treatment.
AB - Mice injected from day of birth onwards with rabbit anti‐mouse IgM (anti‐μ) antibodies were found to be B cell‐deficient and defective for the induction of antigen‐reactive proliferating T cells (TPRLF). This defective induction was not due to the absence of circulating antigen‐specific antibodies since the daily injections of such antibodies during exposure to antigen did not restore the ability of anti‐IgM treated animals to generate TPRLF. Analyzing the cellular events implicated in the induction of virgin antigen‐reactive T cells, anti‐μ‐treated mice manifested impairment of the three interacting cell types involved in the induction of TPRLF. Thus, peritoneal and splenic antigen‐presenting cells from such animals were impaired in their capacity to signal a primary antigen‐specific T cell reaction. Their splenic lymphocytes could not function as initiator cells in transferring immunogenic signals to recruit TPRLF in normal recipients. Potent antigen‐specific splenic initiator cells failed to induce the recruitment of specific TPRLF in anti‐μ‐treated mice. The defective induction of TPRLF in anti‐μ‐treated mice may be due to a functional impairment of cells expressing membranebound IgM molecules which seemingly play a central role in the transfer of immunogenic signals for the recruitment of antigen‐specific circulating T cells. We suggest that splenic B cells function as initiators in the transfer of antigen‐induced signals from peritoneal antigen‐presenting cells to T cells. These seems to be the primary targets of anti‐μ treatment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020684207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/eji.1830130214
DO - 10.1002/eji.1830130214
M3 - Article
C2 - 6403358
AN - SCOPUS:0020684207
SN - 0014-2980
VL - 13
SP - 167
EP - 171
JO - European Journal of Immunology
JF - European Journal of Immunology
IS - 2
ER -