Abstract
Consider the following puzzle: If earnings management is harmful to shareholders, why don't they design contracts that induce managers to reveal the truth? To answer this question, we model the shareholders-manager relationship as a principal-agent game in which the agent (the manager) alone observes the economic outcome. We show that the limited liability (LL) of the agent, defined as the agent's feasible minimum payment, might explain the demand for earnings management by the principal. Specifically, when the LL level is high (low), a contract that induces earnings management may be less (more) costly than a truth-revealing contract. This finding offers a new explanation of the demand for earnings management.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 125-153 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | Review of Accounting Studies |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Mar 2007 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Limited liability
- Principal-agent contract
- Report management
- Revelation principle
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Accounting
- General Business, Management and Accounting