TY - JOUR
T1 - Desirable attributes of theories, models, and frameworks for implementation strategy design in healthcare
T2 - a scoping review protocol
AU - Porat-Dahlerbruch, Joshua
AU - Fontaine, Guillaume
AU - Bourbeau-Allard, Ève
AU - Spinewine, Anne
AU - Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
AU - Ellen, Moriah E.
N1 - Funding Information:
JPD is supported by the U.S.-Israel Fulbright Commission [grant no. 11541-IS]. GF is supported by a Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship (#202010BPF-453986-255367) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), a Postdoctoral Fellowship Supplement from the University of Ottawa, and a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Canadian Network on Hepatitis C (CanHepC). CanHepC is funded by a joint initiative of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (NPC-178912) and the Public Health Agency of Canada. JMG holds a CIHR Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer and Uptake and has a CIHR Foundation Grant (FDN-143269). AS was supported by a Mobility Grant from Foundation Mont-Godinne (2021-2022).
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright: © 2022 Porat-Dahlerbruch J et al.
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - Background: Implementation strategies can facilitate the adoption of evidence-based practices and policies. A wide range of theoretical approaches—theories, models, and frameworks—can be used to inform implementation strategy design in different ways (e.g., guiding barrier and enabler assessment to implementing evidence-based interventions). While selection criteria and attributes of theoretical approaches for use in implementation strategy design have been studied, they have never been synthesized. Furthermore, theoretical approaches have never been classified according to desirable criteria and attributes for use in implementation strategy design. This scoping review aims to a) identify the literature reporting on the selection of theoretical approaches for informing implementation strategy design in healthcare and b) understand the suggested use of these approaches in implementation strategy design. Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidelines will be used to conduct this scoping review. A search of three bibliographical databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL) will be conducted for peer-reviewed discussion, methods, protocol, or review papers. Data will be managed using the Covidence software. Two review team members will independently perform screening, full text review and data extraction. Results: Results will include a list of selection criteria and attributes of theoretical approaches for use in research on implementation strategy design. Descriptive data regarding selection criteria and attributes will be synthesized graphically and in table format. Data regarding the suggested use of theoretical approaches in implementation strategy design will be presented narratively. Conclusions: Results will be used to classify existing theoretical approaches according to the attributes and selection criteria identified in this scoping review. Envisioned next steps include an online tool that will be created to assist researchers in selecting theories, models, and frameworks for implementation strategy design.
AB - Background: Implementation strategies can facilitate the adoption of evidence-based practices and policies. A wide range of theoretical approaches—theories, models, and frameworks—can be used to inform implementation strategy design in different ways (e.g., guiding barrier and enabler assessment to implementing evidence-based interventions). While selection criteria and attributes of theoretical approaches for use in implementation strategy design have been studied, they have never been synthesized. Furthermore, theoretical approaches have never been classified according to desirable criteria and attributes for use in implementation strategy design. This scoping review aims to a) identify the literature reporting on the selection of theoretical approaches for informing implementation strategy design in healthcare and b) understand the suggested use of these approaches in implementation strategy design. Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidelines will be used to conduct this scoping review. A search of three bibliographical databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL) will be conducted for peer-reviewed discussion, methods, protocol, or review papers. Data will be managed using the Covidence software. Two review team members will independently perform screening, full text review and data extraction. Results: Results will include a list of selection criteria and attributes of theoretical approaches for use in research on implementation strategy design. Descriptive data regarding selection criteria and attributes will be synthesized graphically and in table format. Data regarding the suggested use of theoretical approaches in implementation strategy design will be presented narratively. Conclusions: Results will be used to classify existing theoretical approaches according to the attributes and selection criteria identified in this scoping review. Envisioned next steps include an online tool that will be created to assist researchers in selecting theories, models, and frameworks for implementation strategy design.
KW - implementation; implementation science; review; theory; evidence-based practice; literature review; protocol; knowledge translation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152901365&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.12688/f1000research.124821.1
DO - 10.12688/f1000research.124821.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85152901365
SN - 2046-1402
VL - 11
JO - F1000Research
JF - F1000Research
M1 - 1003
ER -