TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of the UPSIDES global mental health training programme for peer support workers
T2 - Perspectives from stakeholders in low, middle and high-income countries
AU - Nixdorf, Rebecca
AU - Kotera, Yasuhiro
AU - Baillie, Dave
AU - Epstein, Paula Garber
AU - Hall, Cerdic
AU - Hiltensperger, Ramona
AU - Korde, Palak
AU - Moran, Galia
AU - Mpango, Richard
AU - Nakku, Juliet
AU - Puschner, Bernd
AU - Ramesh, Mary
AU - Repper, Julie
AU - Shamba, Donat
AU - Slade, Mike
AU - Kalha, Jasmine
AU - Mahlke, Candelaria
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Nixdorf et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License,
PY - 2024/2/1
Y1 - 2024/2/1
N2 - Background Peer support in mental health is a low-threshold intervention with increasing evidence for enhancing personal recovery and empowerment of persons living with severe mental health conditions. As peer support spreads globally, there is a growing need for peer support training programmes that work well in different contexts and cultures. This study evaluates the applicability and transferability of implementing a manualised multi-national training programme for mental health peer support workers called UPSIDES from the perspective of different local stakeholders in high-, middle-, and low-income countries. Method Data from seven focus groups across six study sites in Africa (Tanzania, Uganda), Asia (India, Israel), and Europe (Germany 2 sites) with 44 participants (3 service users, 7 peer support workers, 25 mental health staff members, 6 clinical directors and 3 local community stakeholders) were thematically analysed. Results 397 codes were identified, which were thematically analysed. Five implementation enablers were identified: (i) Enhancing applicability through better guidance and clarity of training programme management, (ii) provision of sufficient time for training, (iii) addressing negative attitudes towards peer support workers by additional training of organisations and staff, (iv) inclusion of core components in the training manual such as communication skills, and (v) addressing cultural differences of society, mental health services and discrimination of mental health conditions. Discussion Participants in all focus groups discussed the implementation of the training and peer support intervention to a greater extent than the content of the training. This is in line with growing literature of difficulties in the implementation of peer support including difficulties in hiring peer support workers, lack of funding, and lack of role clarity. The results of this qualitative study with stakeholders from different mental health settings worldwide emphasises the need to further investigate the successful implementation of peer support training. All results have been incorporated into the manualisation of the UPSIDES peer support training.
AB - Background Peer support in mental health is a low-threshold intervention with increasing evidence for enhancing personal recovery and empowerment of persons living with severe mental health conditions. As peer support spreads globally, there is a growing need for peer support training programmes that work well in different contexts and cultures. This study evaluates the applicability and transferability of implementing a manualised multi-national training programme for mental health peer support workers called UPSIDES from the perspective of different local stakeholders in high-, middle-, and low-income countries. Method Data from seven focus groups across six study sites in Africa (Tanzania, Uganda), Asia (India, Israel), and Europe (Germany 2 sites) with 44 participants (3 service users, 7 peer support workers, 25 mental health staff members, 6 clinical directors and 3 local community stakeholders) were thematically analysed. Results 397 codes were identified, which were thematically analysed. Five implementation enablers were identified: (i) Enhancing applicability through better guidance and clarity of training programme management, (ii) provision of sufficient time for training, (iii) addressing negative attitudes towards peer support workers by additional training of organisations and staff, (iv) inclusion of core components in the training manual such as communication skills, and (v) addressing cultural differences of society, mental health services and discrimination of mental health conditions. Discussion Participants in all focus groups discussed the implementation of the training and peer support intervention to a greater extent than the content of the training. This is in line with growing literature of difficulties in the implementation of peer support including difficulties in hiring peer support workers, lack of funding, and lack of role clarity. The results of this qualitative study with stakeholders from different mental health settings worldwide emphasises the need to further investigate the successful implementation of peer support training. All results have been incorporated into the manualisation of the UPSIDES peer support training.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185890581&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0298315
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0298315
M3 - Article
C2 - 38408108
AN - SCOPUS:85185890581
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 19
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 2 February
M1 - e0298315
ER -