Diagnostic value of the computerized tube leukocyte adherence inhibition (Lai) assay for human colorectal, breast and lung cancers

Y. Berner, A. Fink, A. Shani, Z. Weisman, A. Eliraz, I. Bruderman, Z. Bentwich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

We have tested by the computerized tube leukocyte adherence inhibition (LAI) assay. 319. 100 and 342 patients and controls for the presence of antitumor immunity to colorectal. breast and lung cancers. The assay was standardized and its sensitivity increased by using, as a challenging antigen, spent medium of human carcinoma cell lines and by the addition of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). By large, the sensitivity of the assay (after the addition of PGE2) was inversely related to tumor burden, namely, it was 82.7, 78.9, and 88.6% as compared to 57.1, 33.3, and 29.6% for the early and late stages of colorectal, breast and lung cancers, respectively. Calculating the frequency of disease in the population studied and in comparison with known frequencies of the same in the general population, the positive and negative predicting values (PVPpos. PVncg) were obtained. Our results demonstrate that the LAI assay cannot be applied for mass screening since its low PVpos would impair its effectiveness. However, its application to a population at high risk for developing a particular malignancy or as a second-line modality to more conventional screening methods would increase its cost-effectiveness and favor its applicability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327-334
Number of pages8
JournalOncology
Volume43
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 1986
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Diagnostic value of LAI assay
  • Leukocyte adherence inhibition (LAI) assay

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic value of the computerized tube leukocyte adherence inhibition (Lai) assay for human colorectal, breast and lung cancers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this