TY - JOUR
T1 - Differentiating transcranial magnetic stimulation cortical and auditory responses via single pulse and paired pulse protocols
T2 - A TMS-EEG study
AU - Poorganji, Mohsen
AU - Zomorrodi, Reza
AU - Hawco, Colin
AU - Hill, Aron T.
AU - Hadas, Itay
AU - Rajji, Tarek K.
AU - Chen, Robert
AU - Voineskos, Daphne
AU - Daskalakis, Anastasios A.
AU - Blumberger, Daniel M.
AU - Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/8/1
Y1 - 2021/8/1
N2 - Objective: We measured the neurophysiological responses of both active and sham transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for both single pulse (SP) and paired pulse (PP; long interval cortical inhibition (LICI)) paradigms using TMS-EEG (electroencephalography). Methods: Nineteen healthy subjects received active and sham (coil 90° tilted and touching the scalp) SP and PP TMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). We measured excitability through SP TMS and inhibition (i.e., cortical inhibition (CI)) through PP TMS. Results: Cortical excitability indexed by area under the curve (AUC(25-275ms)) was significantly higher in the active compared to sham stimulation (F(1,18) = 43.737, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.708). Moreover, the amplitude of N100-P200 complex was significantly larger (F(1,18) = 9.118, p < 0.01, η2 = 0.336) with active stimulation (10.38 ± 9.576 µV) compared to sham (4.295 ± 2.323 µV). Significant interaction effects were also observed between active and sham stimulation for both the SP and PP (i.e., LICI) cortical responses. Finally, only active stimulation (CI = 0.64 ± 0.23, p < 0.001) resulted in significant cortical inhibition. Conclusion: The significant differences between active and sham stimulation in both excitatory and inhibitory neurophysiological responses showed that active stimulation elicits responses from the cortex that are different from the non-specific effects of sham stimulation. Significance: Our study reaffirms that TMS-EEG represents an effective tool to evaluate cortical neurophysiology with high fidelity.
AB - Objective: We measured the neurophysiological responses of both active and sham transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for both single pulse (SP) and paired pulse (PP; long interval cortical inhibition (LICI)) paradigms using TMS-EEG (electroencephalography). Methods: Nineteen healthy subjects received active and sham (coil 90° tilted and touching the scalp) SP and PP TMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). We measured excitability through SP TMS and inhibition (i.e., cortical inhibition (CI)) through PP TMS. Results: Cortical excitability indexed by area under the curve (AUC(25-275ms)) was significantly higher in the active compared to sham stimulation (F(1,18) = 43.737, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.708). Moreover, the amplitude of N100-P200 complex was significantly larger (F(1,18) = 9.118, p < 0.01, η2 = 0.336) with active stimulation (10.38 ± 9.576 µV) compared to sham (4.295 ± 2.323 µV). Significant interaction effects were also observed between active and sham stimulation for both the SP and PP (i.e., LICI) cortical responses. Finally, only active stimulation (CI = 0.64 ± 0.23, p < 0.001) resulted in significant cortical inhibition. Conclusion: The significant differences between active and sham stimulation in both excitatory and inhibitory neurophysiological responses showed that active stimulation elicits responses from the cortex that are different from the non-specific effects of sham stimulation. Significance: Our study reaffirms that TMS-EEG represents an effective tool to evaluate cortical neurophysiology with high fidelity.
KW - Long interval cortical inhibition
KW - Sham TMS
KW - TMS-EEG
KW - TMS-evoked potential
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108013066&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.05.009
DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.05.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 34147010
AN - SCOPUS:85108013066
SN - 1388-2457
VL - 132
SP - 1850
EP - 1858
JO - Clinical Neurophysiology
JF - Clinical Neurophysiology
IS - 8
ER -