Digital versus Local Anesthesia for Finger Lacerations: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Stuart Chale, Adam J. Singer, Scott Marchini, Mary Jo McBride, David Kennedy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the pain of needle insertion, anesthesia, and suturing in finger lacerations after local anesthesia with prior topical anesthesia with that experienced after digital anesthesia. Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial in a university-based emergency department (ED), with an annual census of 75,000 patient visits. ED patients aged ≥8 years with finger lacerations were enrolled. After standard wound preparation and 15-minute topical application of lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine (LET) in all wounds, lacerations were randomized to anesthesia with either local or digital infiltration of 1% lidocaine. Pain of needle insertion, anesthetic infiltration, and suturing were recorded on a validated 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (none) to 100 (worst); also recorded were percentage of wounds requiring rescue anesthesia; time until anesthesia; percentage of wounds with infection or numbness at day 7. Outcomes were compared by using Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests. A sample of 52 patients had 80% power to detect a 15-mm difference in pain scores. Results: Fifty-five patients were randomized to digital (n = 28) or local (n = 27) anesthesia. Mean age (±SD) was 38.1 (±16.8) years, 29% were female. Mean (±SD) laceration length and width were 1.7 (±0.7) cm and 2.0 (±1.0) mm, respectively. Groups were similar in baseline patient and wound characteristics. There were no between-group differences in pain of needle insertion (mean difference, 1.3 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -17.0 to 14.3 mm); anesthetic infiltration (mean difference, 2.3 mm; 95% CI = -19.7 to 4.4 mm), or suturing (mean difference, 7.6 mm; 95% CI = -3.3 to 21.1 mm). Only one patient in the digital anesthesia group required rescue anesthesia. There were no wound infections or persistent numbness in either group. Conclusions: Digital and local anesthesia of finger lacerations with prior application of LET to all wounds results in similar pain of needle insertion, anesthetic infiltration, and pain of suturing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1046-1050
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume13
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • digital block
  • fingers
  • lacerations
  • lidocaine
  • local anesthesia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Digital versus Local Anesthesia for Finger Lacerations: A Randomized Controlled Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this