Abstract
The discouragement effect of being the lagging player in multi-stage contests is a well-documented phenomenon. In this study, we utilize data from 2447 Davis Cup matches in team tennis tournaments to test the effect of being behind or ahead on individuals’ performance with and without intermediate prizes. Using several different strategies to disentangle the effect of being ahead in the interim score from the effect of selection, we find the usual discouragement effect. However, the discouragement effect disappears after the introduction of intermediate prizes in the form of ranking points. The lagging favorite had close to a 20-percentage point greater probability of winning compared to matches without such a prize. We show that this result is not driven by the selection of better players into tournaments with intermediate prizes. As predicted by previous theoretical studies, our empirical findings suggest that intermediate prizes may mitigate or even eliminate the ahead–behind effects that arise in multi-stage contests.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 364-381 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | European Economic Review |
| Volume | 118 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Sep 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Collective decision-making
- Discouragement
- Multi-stage contests
- Tennis
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics