TY - JOUR
T1 - Disparities in occupational health services
T2 - an international comparative study
AU - Krakov, Ayala Olga
AU - Zack, Oren
AU - Sagiv, Oren Y.
AU - Slodownik, Dan
AU - Raanan, Rachel
AU - Alperovitch-Najenson, Deborah
AU - Rinsky‑Halivni, Lilah
AU - Moshe, Shlomo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023/12/1
Y1 - 2023/12/1
N2 - Background: Occupational Health Services (OHS) are comprehensive, multidisciplinary services supplied by various trained workers, including occupational physicians (OP), whose specialty is focused on workers’ health. Aims: Our study questions are whether the OP/worker ratio may reflect the scope and availability of OHS. Methods: This comparative study, conducted on globally different OHS, was based on literature analysis of peer-reviewed articles published in journals covering topics of occupational medicine and public health that addressed parameters on the type and scope of OHS provision. Results: We described the number of OP/worker ratio, and the correlation to economic parameters (Gross domestic product—GDP, health expenditure, Gini Index—GI) by country. We found that among countries with a GDP per capita higher than US$30,000, only three (US, South Korea and Israel) had a very low OP/worker ratio (about 1:50,000 compared to 1:5,000 in other countries). Looking at all the countries together, there was a statistically significant negative correlation between health expenditure percentage of GDP per capita and OP/worker ratio (rs = -0.54, p = 0.01) and a significant positive correlation between GI and OP/worker ratio (rs = 0.47, p = 0.04). Conclusions: The lesser the percentage of health expenditure of GDP and the subsequent greater general inequality as reflected by the GI, the lower the OP/worker ratio. The data collected in our comparative study show that the OP/worker ratio is a parameter both easy to define and obtain which best represents the status and disparity of OHS in each country.
AB - Background: Occupational Health Services (OHS) are comprehensive, multidisciplinary services supplied by various trained workers, including occupational physicians (OP), whose specialty is focused on workers’ health. Aims: Our study questions are whether the OP/worker ratio may reflect the scope and availability of OHS. Methods: This comparative study, conducted on globally different OHS, was based on literature analysis of peer-reviewed articles published in journals covering topics of occupational medicine and public health that addressed parameters on the type and scope of OHS provision. Results: We described the number of OP/worker ratio, and the correlation to economic parameters (Gross domestic product—GDP, health expenditure, Gini Index—GI) by country. We found that among countries with a GDP per capita higher than US$30,000, only three (US, South Korea and Israel) had a very low OP/worker ratio (about 1:50,000 compared to 1:5,000 in other countries). Looking at all the countries together, there was a statistically significant negative correlation between health expenditure percentage of GDP per capita and OP/worker ratio (rs = -0.54, p = 0.01) and a significant positive correlation between GI and OP/worker ratio (rs = 0.47, p = 0.04). Conclusions: The lesser the percentage of health expenditure of GDP and the subsequent greater general inequality as reflected by the GI, the lower the OP/worker ratio. The data collected in our comparative study show that the OP/worker ratio is a parameter both easy to define and obtain which best represents the status and disparity of OHS in each country.
KW - Disparity in occupational medicine
KW - Occupational health services
KW - Occupational physicians
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85171332962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12995-023-00386-2
DO - 10.1186/s12995-023-00386-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 37710277
AN - SCOPUS:85171332962
SN - 1745-6673
VL - 18
JO - Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
JF - Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
IS - 1
M1 - 21
ER -