TY - JOUR
T1 - Distinguishing adaptive from nonadaptive genetic differentiation
T2 - Comparison of QST and FST at two spatial scales
AU - Volis, S.
AU - Yakubov, B.
AU - Shulgina, I.
AU - Ward, D.
AU - Mendlinger, S.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Richard Nichols and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. A grant from the Israel Academy of Sciences (86293101) supported this study.
PY - 2005/12/1
Y1 - 2005/12/1
N2 - Genetic differentiation in 20 hierarchically sampled populations of wild barley was analyzed with quantitative traits, allozymes and Random Amplified Polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), and compared for three marker types at two hierarchical levels. Regional subdivision for both molecular markers was much lower than for quantitative traits. For both allozymes and RAPDs, most loci exhibited minor or no regional differentiation, and the relatively high overall estimates of the latter were due to several loci with exceptionally high regional differentiation. The allozyme- and RAPD-specific patterns of differentiation were concordant in general with one another, but not with quantitative trait differentiation. Divergent selection on quantitative traits inferred from very high regional QST was in full agreement with our previous results obtained from a test of local adaptation and multilevel selection analysis. In contrast, most variation in allozyme and RAPD variation was neutral, although several allozyme loci and RAPD markers were exceptional in their levels of regional differentiation. However, it is not possible to answer the question whether these exceptional loci are directly involved in the response to selection pressure or merely linked to the selected loci. The fact that QST and FST did not differ at the population scale, that is, within regions, but differed at the regional scale, for which local adaptation has been previously shown, implies that comparison of the level of subdivision in quantitative traits, as compared with molecular markers, is indicative of adaptive population differentiation only when sampling is carried out at the appropriate scale.
AB - Genetic differentiation in 20 hierarchically sampled populations of wild barley was analyzed with quantitative traits, allozymes and Random Amplified Polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), and compared for three marker types at two hierarchical levels. Regional subdivision for both molecular markers was much lower than for quantitative traits. For both allozymes and RAPDs, most loci exhibited minor or no regional differentiation, and the relatively high overall estimates of the latter were due to several loci with exceptionally high regional differentiation. The allozyme- and RAPD-specific patterns of differentiation were concordant in general with one another, but not with quantitative trait differentiation. Divergent selection on quantitative traits inferred from very high regional QST was in full agreement with our previous results obtained from a test of local adaptation and multilevel selection analysis. In contrast, most variation in allozyme and RAPD variation was neutral, although several allozyme loci and RAPD markers were exceptional in their levels of regional differentiation. However, it is not possible to answer the question whether these exceptional loci are directly involved in the response to selection pressure or merely linked to the selected loci. The fact that QST and FST did not differ at the population scale, that is, within regions, but differed at the regional scale, for which local adaptation has been previously shown, implies that comparison of the level of subdivision in quantitative traits, as compared with molecular markers, is indicative of adaptive population differentiation only when sampling is carried out at the appropriate scale.
KW - Adaptation
KW - Hordeum spontaneum
KW - Molecular markers
KW - Population genetic structure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28344442950&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800745
DO - 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800745
M3 - Article
C2 - 16189543
AN - SCOPUS:28344442950
SN - 0018-067X
VL - 95
SP - 466
EP - 475
JO - Heredity
JF - Heredity
IS - 6
ER -