Does acquired resistance of rodent hosts affect metabolic rate of fleas?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

We studied whether (a) previous infestation of a rodent host with fleas and (b) the reproductive effort of fleas affect the rate of CO2 emission in two flea species, host-specific Parapulex chephrenis and host-opportunistic Xenopsylla ramesis when feeding on their typical and atypical rodent hosts. We measured the rate of CO2 emission in preovipositing and ovipositing female fleas fed on either pristine or previously infested Acomys cahirinus (typical host of P. chephrenis) and Dipodillus dasyurus (typical host of X. ramesis). When P. chephrenis fed on a typical host, its mass-specific rate of CO2 emission was not affected by previous infestation of a host, whereas when this flea fed on the atypical host, its rate of CO2 emission was higher when a host was previously infested. This was manifested, however, mainly during the oviposition period. The rate of CO2 emission by X. ramesis feeding on pristine hosts was significantly lower than in conspecifics feeding on previously infested hosts, independent of host species. Both flea species feeding on their typical hosts emitted CO2 at similar mass-specific rates during preoviposition and oviposition, except for P. chephrenis feeding on D. dasyurus, which increased its rate during oviposition. There was no effect of the number of eggs produced per female on the rate of CO2 emission during oviposition. J. Exp. Zool. 311A:389-398, 2009.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)389-398
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology
Volume311
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Physiology
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does acquired resistance of rodent hosts affect metabolic rate of fleas?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this