Abstract
The article analyzes debut interviews of female Israeli politicians, in which the interviewees are faced with questions or statements that imply that their gender, ethnicity or background prevent them from fulfilling their function as politicians successfully, in accordance with the "Gendered mediation thesis" (GoodYear-Grant 2013). We focus on the interviewees' responses to these questions, and particularly on how grammatically negative utterances are deployed in the service of coping with the presuppositions directed at them. The analysis indicates that the negative utterances do not carry the full weight of rejection of implied presuppositions. Moreover, in some cases negative utterances are used by the speakers as part of a hedging strategy. By describing the role of negation in debut interviews of female Israeli politicians, the paper aims to advance a more comprehensive understanding of linguistic patterns used by women, and other silenced groups, to cope with biased representation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 239-260 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Journal of Language and Politics |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 8 Mar 2024 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- challenge
- Female politicians
- gendered media representation
- negation
- presupposition
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- History
- Sociology and Political Science
- Linguistics and Language