TY - JOUR
T1 - “Don't think, just shoot”–The paradox of shooting three-point shots in basketball
AU - Lidor, Ronnie
AU - Lipshits, Lior
AU - Arnon, Michal
AU - Bar-Eli, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 International Society of Sport Psychology.
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - A two-phase study was conducted on shooting three-point shots in basketball in pressure/no-pressure game situations. In Phase 1–a subjective approach, our aim was to discover what the players and coaches thought about shooting beyond the three-point arc when the shooters were performing under defensive pressure or when they were free of such pressure. In Phase 2–an analysis of shooting success, we examined the actual success (i.e., percentage of successful shots) of shooting three-point shots under these two situations. In Phase 1, 97 Division 1 male basketball players and 12 elite coaches were asked how they perceived shooting three-point shots in various game situations. In Phase 2, the success of 382 three-point shots taken in actual Division 1 games was analyzed. The shots were classified by four expert coaches into two categories–shots taken in free-of-defense and shots taken in under-pressure game situations. The success of the two classified shots was analyzed under 10 conditions. Expected results were found in Phase 1–both players and coaches believed that the success of three-point shots is higher when the shots are taken when the shooter is free of defense. In Phase 2, a surprising finding was revealed: shooting success was higher when the players shot under defensive pressure. We discuss the data in line with Kahneman’s (2011), Thinking, fast and slow, model, and propose a number of practical implications for coaches who are preparing their three-point shooters to deal with real game situations.
AB - A two-phase study was conducted on shooting three-point shots in basketball in pressure/no-pressure game situations. In Phase 1–a subjective approach, our aim was to discover what the players and coaches thought about shooting beyond the three-point arc when the shooters were performing under defensive pressure or when they were free of such pressure. In Phase 2–an analysis of shooting success, we examined the actual success (i.e., percentage of successful shots) of shooting three-point shots under these two situations. In Phase 1, 97 Division 1 male basketball players and 12 elite coaches were asked how they perceived shooting three-point shots in various game situations. In Phase 2, the success of 382 three-point shots taken in actual Division 1 games was analyzed. The shots were classified by four expert coaches into two categories–shots taken in free-of-defense and shots taken in under-pressure game situations. The success of the two classified shots was analyzed under 10 conditions. Expected results were found in Phase 1–both players and coaches believed that the success of three-point shots is higher when the shots are taken when the shooter is free of defense. In Phase 2, a surprising finding was revealed: shooting success was higher when the players shot under defensive pressure. We discuss the data in line with Kahneman’s (2011), Thinking, fast and slow, model, and propose a number of practical implications for coaches who are preparing their three-point shooters to deal with real game situations.
KW - Shooting success
KW - System 1
KW - System 2
KW - basketball
KW - choking under pressure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117254814&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1612197X.2021.1987957
DO - 10.1080/1612197X.2021.1987957
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85117254814
SN - 1612-197X
VL - 20
SP - 1523
EP - 1541
JO - International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
JF - International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
IS - 6
ER -