Double-blind randomized study of 1 g versus 2 g intravenous ceftriaxone daily in the therapy of community-acquired infections

S. Segev, R. Raz, E. Rubinstein, H. Shmuely, D. Hassin, N. Rosen, E. Platau, S. Ben Assuli, S. Pitlik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

In a multicentre, double-blind, randomized study involving four general hospitals in Israel, the efficacy and safety of ceftriaxone 1 g/day i.v. was compared to that of 2 g/day i.v. in the treatment of moderate to severe community-acquired infections requiring hospitalization. Two hundred and twenty-two patients were enrolled; 112 received intravenous ceftriaxone 1 g/day, and 110 received 2 g/day. The two groups were matched demographically, and their mean APACHE II score (10 points) and mean duration of successful therapy (7 days) were identical. The sites of infection in the 1 g and 2 g groups respectively were lower respiratory tract in 57 versus 51 patients, urinary tract in 31 versus 40 patients, and soft tissue in 24 versus 19 patients. There were no significant differences in clinical outcome between the 1 g and 2 g groups, the outcome being cure in 91 % versus 86 % of patients, improvement in 3 % versus 3 % of patients, failure in 3 % versus 8 % of patients, and relapse in 3 % versus 3 % of patients. The findings of this study indicate that ceftriaxone 1 g/day is as effective as 2 g/day in the treatment of moderate to severe community-acquired infections. The low-dose form is a more economical means of treating these infections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)851-855
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Volume14
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 1995
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Double-blind randomized study of 1 g versus 2 g intravenous ceftriaxone daily in the therapy of community-acquired infections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this