TY - JOUR
T1 - Dynamic changes in left ventricular function after a percutaneous coronary intervention
T2 - Prevalence, predictors, and prognosis
AU - Levi, Amos
AU - Bental, Tamir
AU - Assali, Abid R.
AU - Lev, Eli I.
AU - Assa, Hana Vaknin
AU - Shaul, Aviv A.
AU - Sagie, Alexander
AU - Kornowski, Ran
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - Objectives To estimate the prevalence, identify predictors, and assess the prognostic implications of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) changes after an elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods We included all consecutive patients who underwent elective PCI in our institution and were evaluated with echocardiography before and within 1 year of the procedure. Patients were grouped in terms of baseline LVEF. Hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality and acute myocardial infarction were calculated for baseline LVEF groups and in terms of LVEF normalization or decline. Results A total of 974 patients were included. Patients with moderately impaired (HR 1.41, P=0.01) and poor LVEF (HR 2.44, P<0.001) had significantly worse survival in comparison with patients with good LVEF. Decline from preserved to impaired LVEF following PCI was associated with an increased 1-year risk (HR 3.48, P<0.001) and 5-year risk (HR 2.79, P<0.001) for the composite outcome of allcause mortality and acute myocardial infarction. LVEF recovery from impaired to preserved was associated with a decreased 5-year risk for the composite outcome (HR 0.5, P<0.001). Conclusion Changes in LVEF after elective PCI occur often. Both higher baseline LVEF and post-PCI LVEF normalization are associated with improved outcomes.
AB - Objectives To estimate the prevalence, identify predictors, and assess the prognostic implications of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) changes after an elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods We included all consecutive patients who underwent elective PCI in our institution and were evaluated with echocardiography before and within 1 year of the procedure. Patients were grouped in terms of baseline LVEF. Hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality and acute myocardial infarction were calculated for baseline LVEF groups and in terms of LVEF normalization or decline. Results A total of 974 patients were included. Patients with moderately impaired (HR 1.41, P=0.01) and poor LVEF (HR 2.44, P<0.001) had significantly worse survival in comparison with patients with good LVEF. Decline from preserved to impaired LVEF following PCI was associated with an increased 1-year risk (HR 3.48, P<0.001) and 5-year risk (HR 2.79, P<0.001) for the composite outcome of allcause mortality and acute myocardial infarction. LVEF recovery from impaired to preserved was associated with a decreased 5-year risk for the composite outcome (HR 0.5, P<0.001). Conclusion Changes in LVEF after elective PCI occur often. Both higher baseline LVEF and post-PCI LVEF normalization are associated with improved outcomes.
KW - Echocardiography
KW - Elective percutaneous coronary intervention
KW - Hibernating myocardium
KW - Left ventricular ejection fraction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957713789&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000351
DO - 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000351
M3 - Article
C2 - 26848535
AN - SCOPUS:84957713789
SN - 0954-6928
VL - 27
SP - 199
EP - 206
JO - Coronary Artery Disease
JF - Coronary Artery Disease
IS - 3
ER -