Dynamic voting for consistent primary components

Esti Yeger Lotem, Idit Keidar, Danny Dolev

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Distributed applications often use quorums in order to guarantee consistency. With emerging world-wide communication technology, many new applications (e.g., conferencing applications and interactive games) wish to allow users to freely join and leave, without restarting the entire system. The dynamic voting paradigm allows such systems to define quorums adaptively, accounting for the changes in the set of participants. Furthermore, dynamic voting was proven to be the most available paradigm for maintaining quorums in unreliable networks. However, the subtleties of implementing dynamic voting were not well understood; in fact, many of the suggested protocols may lead to inconsistencies in case of failures. Other protocols severely limit the availability in case failures occur during the protocol. In this paper we present a robust and efficient dynamic voting protocol for unreliable asynchronous networks. The protocol consistently maintains the primary component in a distributed system. Our protocol allows the system to make progress in cases of repetitive failures in which previously suggested protocols block. The protocol is simple to implement, and its communication requirements are small.

Original languageEnglish
Pages63-71
Number of pages9
StatePublished - 1 Jan 1997
Externally publishedYes
EventProceedings of the 1997 16th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing - Santa Barbara, CA, USA
Duration: 21 Aug 199724 Aug 1997

Conference

ConferenceProceedings of the 1997 16th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
CitySanta Barbara, CA, USA
Period21/08/9724/08/97

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dynamic voting for consistent primary components'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this