Early diagnosis of occult hip fractures: MRI versus CT scan

O. Lubovsky, M. Liebergall, Y. Mattan, Y. Weil, R. Mosheiff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

127 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: We compared Computerised Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in diagnosis of a painful hip in elderly patients after trauma. We report on accuracy, efficiency and benefits. Design: We assessed 13 patients, average age 73 years, after fall with plain X-rays showing no evidence of fracture. There were two groups: Group A (six patients) underwent CT and MRI; Group B underwent MRI only. Results: In Group A where all of the six patients underwent CT and MRI, four of the CT images resulted in misdiagnosis due to inaccuracy. In Group B where all the seven patients underwent only MRI, all the results were accurate and enabled a precise and fast diagnosis. Conclusions: MRI was found to be a more accurate modality than CT scan for obtaining early diagnosis of occult hip fractures. These results point out the advantage of immediate MRI imaging in patients with occult hip fracture enabling a more effective treatment, a shorter hospitalisation period entailing decreased medical costs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)788-792
Number of pages5
JournalInjury
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • CT
  • Diagnosis
  • Hip fracture
  • MRI
  • Occult fracture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Early diagnosis of occult hip fractures: MRI versus CT scan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this