Abstract
Do folk-economic beliefs have an ultimate cause? We argue that, in many cases, the answer is negative. Cognition is constrained in both scope (via long-term memory [LTM]) and depth (via working memory [WM]). Consequently, laypeople are challenged by concepts essential for understanding complex systems, economics included: aggregation, indirect causation, and equilibrium. We discuss several economic misconceptions arising from this acute mismatch.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e176 |
| Journal | The Behavioral and brain sciences |
| Volume | 41 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2018 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Physiology
- Behavioral Neuroscience
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Economic complexities and cognitive hurdles: Accounting for specific economic misconceptions without an ultimate cause'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver