Effect of panel composition on appropriateness ratings

Gerald M. Fraser, Dina Pilpel, Jacqueline Kosecoff, Robert H. Brook

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    49 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Cholecystectomy is performed frequently and for relatively few indications. An all surgical panel agreed on more indications and fewer contraindications for cholecystectomy than a mixed specialty panel but did not approve indications for patients with higher comorbidity. In mixed panels subspecialists (gastroenterologists) were more conservative than generalists and surgeons. Similar findings have been shown for carotid endarterectomy. Comparing the results of British and Israeli panels showed variations in rating appropriateness that indicate differences in approach between countries. We conclude that the composition of panels will influence the assessment of appropriateness.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)251-255
    Number of pages5
    JournalInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care
    Volume6
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1 Jan 1994

    Keywords

    • Appropriateness
    • Cholecystectomy
    • Contraindications
    • Indications
    • Panel

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Health Policy
    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of panel composition on appropriateness ratings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this