TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of the User Input Method on Response Time and Accuracy in a Binary Data Labeling Task
AU - Nathan, Yehuda
AU - Rosenblatt, Jonathan D.
AU - Bitan, Yuval
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2022/10/4
Y1 - 2022/10/4
N2 - This study compares response time and accuracy in a binary data labeling task on two platforms: a desktop computer and a mobile phone. Three methods were used on the computer: a keyboard, a mouse, and a mouse with perceptual variability that was designed to combat vigilance decrement. Three additional methods were used on the mobile phone: a tap, a swipe touch-gesture, and a tap with perceptual variability. Results of the study show that the fastest was the keyboard, which may explain its popularity in labeling tasks. The second fastest was the tap interface, suggesting the unexploited potential of mobile devices for “labeling while waiting for the bus.” In terms of accuracy, we found clear evidence for a speed–accuracy tradeoff, and the advantage of the perceptual variability methods to be more accurate than the matching methods without perceptual variability. The results suggest that different user input methods should be employed depending on whether response time or accuracy is more valued.
AB - This study compares response time and accuracy in a binary data labeling task on two platforms: a desktop computer and a mobile phone. Three methods were used on the computer: a keyboard, a mouse, and a mouse with perceptual variability that was designed to combat vigilance decrement. Three additional methods were used on the mobile phone: a tap, a swipe touch-gesture, and a tap with perceptual variability. Results of the study show that the fastest was the keyboard, which may explain its popularity in labeling tasks. The second fastest was the tap interface, suggesting the unexploited potential of mobile devices for “labeling while waiting for the bus.” In terms of accuracy, we found clear evidence for a speed–accuracy tradeoff, and the advantage of the perceptual variability methods to be more accurate than the matching methods without perceptual variability. The results suggest that different user input methods should be employed depending on whether response time or accuracy is more valued.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139386463&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10447318.2022.2128943
DO - 10.1080/10447318.2022.2128943
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85139386463
SN - 1044-7318
JO - International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
JF - International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
ER -