TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of Numerosity Range on Tactile and Visual Enumeration
AU - Cohen, Zahira Z.
AU - Henik, Avishai
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Israel Science Foundation (Grant 1799/12) in the framework of their Centers of Excellence.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, © The Author(s) 2015.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - Our study explores tactile enumeration using both hands and investigates the effects of numerosity range’s (NR) on general enumeration. In Experiment 1, using custom-made vibro-tactile apparatus, we replicated results of Cohen, Naparstek, and Henik (2014, Acta Psychologica, 150C, 26–34) and again found a moderate increase in RT up to four stimuli and then a decrease for five stimuli. In Experiment 2, we used a within participants design and compared NR 1 to 5 and 1 to 10 in tactile and visual enumeration. The results showed that enumeration for NR 5 to 1 was faster than for NR 1 to 10, especially for numerosities four and five. Within NR 1 to 10, in the visual modality the subitizing range was 4, the counting range was from 5 to 9, and there was an end effect of 10 dots. In the tactile modality, when excluding one-hand arrangements, the subitizing range was 2, the counting range was from 3 to 5, there was an acceleration of counting from 5 and on, and there was an end effect for 10 stimuli that was stronger than for 10 visual stimuli. We suggest that NR influences enumeration and that number-hand association (i.e. resulting from finger counting) influences enumeration, resulting in faster counting.
AB - Our study explores tactile enumeration using both hands and investigates the effects of numerosity range’s (NR) on general enumeration. In Experiment 1, using custom-made vibro-tactile apparatus, we replicated results of Cohen, Naparstek, and Henik (2014, Acta Psychologica, 150C, 26–34) and again found a moderate increase in RT up to four stimuli and then a decrease for five stimuli. In Experiment 2, we used a within participants design and compared NR 1 to 5 and 1 to 10 in tactile and visual enumeration. The results showed that enumeration for NR 5 to 1 was faster than for NR 1 to 10, especially for numerosities four and five. Within NR 1 to 10, in the visual modality the subitizing range was 4, the counting range was from 5 to 9, and there was an end effect of 10 dots. In the tactile modality, when excluding one-hand arrangements, the subitizing range was 2, the counting range was from 3 to 5, there was an acceleration of counting from 5 and on, and there was an end effect for 10 stimuli that was stronger than for 10 visual stimuli. We suggest that NR influences enumeration and that number-hand association (i.e. resulting from finger counting) influences enumeration, resulting in faster counting.
KW - Enumeration
KW - comparison
KW - embodied numerosity
KW - end effect
KW - finger counting
KW - numerosity range
KW - range size
KW - subitizing
KW - tactile
KW - vibro-tactile stimuli
KW - visual
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85000359946&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0301006615614662
DO - 10.1177/0301006615614662
M3 - Article
C2 - 26562882
AN - SCOPUS:85000359946
SN - 0301-0066
VL - 45
SP - 83
EP - 98
JO - Perception
JF - Perception
IS - 1-2
ER -