TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of practical aerosol forward scatter of infrared and visible light on atmospheric coherence diameter
AU - Sadot, Dan
AU - Kopeika, Natan
PY - 1995/1/1
Y1 - 1995/1/1
N2 - A correction to the definition of the atmospheric coherence diameter is
suggested here, based on the existence of a practical
instrumentation-based aerosol modulation transfer function (MTF), which
is often the dominant ingredient of the atmospheric MTF. As defined
classically by Fried about 25 yr ago, atmospheric MTF and coherence
diameter were related to turbulence MTF only. Lutomirski considered
diffractive aerosols, too, but did not consider effects of
instrumentation on scattering angles actually recorded in the image.
These are limited in the real world by instrumentation to milliradians,
rather than by the broad angular spread of diffraction to radians. In
the case of a Gaussian approximation of the practical aerosol MTF, an
analytical expression is derived for the practical aerosol-derived
coherence diameter. This parameter is related to the practical aerosol
MTF's cutoff frequency, and to its asymptotic value at high spatial
frequencies. Thus, a more general concept of atmospheric coherence
diameter is proposed here, which is relevant to actual real-world
imaging systems, whether they are passive or active. Quantitative
validation of the theory is presented, based on both simulations and
actually measured atmospheric MTFs in both the visible and thermal
infrared spectral ranges. Overall atmospheric coherence diameter is
determined generally by the smaller of the turbulence and practical
aerosol coherence diameters, depending on optical depth. The results
here appear applicable particularly to cost-effective thermal imaging
system design, although applications are considered, too, for the
visible and near infrared. For example, blur deriving from aerosol
scatter should have much less effect in coherent detection laser radar
(LIDAR) than in direct detecting imaging.
AB - A correction to the definition of the atmospheric coherence diameter is
suggested here, based on the existence of a practical
instrumentation-based aerosol modulation transfer function (MTF), which
is often the dominant ingredient of the atmospheric MTF. As defined
classically by Fried about 25 yr ago, atmospheric MTF and coherence
diameter were related to turbulence MTF only. Lutomirski considered
diffractive aerosols, too, but did not consider effects of
instrumentation on scattering angles actually recorded in the image.
These are limited in the real world by instrumentation to milliradians,
rather than by the broad angular spread of diffraction to radians. In
the case of a Gaussian approximation of the practical aerosol MTF, an
analytical expression is derived for the practical aerosol-derived
coherence diameter. This parameter is related to the practical aerosol
MTF's cutoff frequency, and to its asymptotic value at high spatial
frequencies. Thus, a more general concept of atmospheric coherence
diameter is proposed here, which is relevant to actual real-world
imaging systems, whether they are passive or active. Quantitative
validation of the theory is presented, based on both simulations and
actually measured atmospheric MTFs in both the visible and thermal
infrared spectral ranges. Overall atmospheric coherence diameter is
determined generally by the smaller of the turbulence and practical
aerosol coherence diameters, depending on optical depth. The results
here appear applicable particularly to cost-effective thermal imaging
system design, although applications are considered, too, for the
visible and near infrared. For example, blur deriving from aerosol
scatter should have much less effect in coherent detection laser radar
(LIDAR) than in direct detecting imaging.
U2 - 10.1117/12.183986
DO - 10.1117/12.183986
M3 - Conference article
SN - 0091-3286
VL - 34
SP - 261
EP - 268
JO - Optical Engineering
JF - Optical Engineering
IS - 1
ER -