TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of psychological inoculation versus health education on physical activity
T2 - Two randomized controlled studies
AU - Dorling, Hannah
AU - Blervacq, Jieg
AU - Gidron, Yori
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Human Kinetics, Inc.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - Background: Effects of health education (HE) on physical activity (PA) are limited. Also, HE fails to address people’s personal barriers and social pressures. In contrast, “psychological inoculation” (PI) targets both topics. This research examined the effects of PI versus HE on PA-related barriers and on self-reported PA in 2 studies. Methods: Randomized controlled trials were employed. Study 1 (N = 20) took place in Britain, while study 2 (N = 40) in Belgium, with nonphysically active participants. PI exposed people to challenging sentences reflecting barriers concerning PA, which they had to refute. In study 1, PA barriers and self-reported PA levels were assessed before and a week after interventions. In study 2, the degree of refuting challenging sentences was estimated and the level of PA was assessed before and 2 months after interventions. Results: In study 1, in the PI condition alone, PA barriers significantly decreased and self-reported PA increased. Change in barriers correlated with posttreatment PA. In study 2, PA increased only in the PI group. Level of rejecting challenging sentences predicted PA later. Most group differences remained when controlling for baseline measures. Conclusions: PI is more effective than HE for increasing PA, and reducing its barriers is essential for this.
AB - Background: Effects of health education (HE) on physical activity (PA) are limited. Also, HE fails to address people’s personal barriers and social pressures. In contrast, “psychological inoculation” (PI) targets both topics. This research examined the effects of PI versus HE on PA-related barriers and on self-reported PA in 2 studies. Methods: Randomized controlled trials were employed. Study 1 (N = 20) took place in Britain, while study 2 (N = 40) in Belgium, with nonphysically active participants. PI exposed people to challenging sentences reflecting barriers concerning PA, which they had to refute. In study 1, PA barriers and self-reported PA levels were assessed before and a week after interventions. In study 2, the degree of refuting challenging sentences was estimated and the level of PA was assessed before and 2 months after interventions. Results: In study 1, in the PI condition alone, PA barriers significantly decreased and self-reported PA increased. Change in barriers correlated with posttreatment PA. In study 2, PA increased only in the PI group. Level of rejecting challenging sentences predicted PA later. Most group differences remained when controlling for baseline measures. Conclusions: PI is more effective than HE for increasing PA, and reducing its barriers is essential for this.
KW - Behavioral science
KW - Community-based research
KW - Health behavior
KW - Intervention study
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046108565&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/jpah.2017-0088
DO - 10.1123/jpah.2017-0088
M3 - Article
C2 - 29421967
AN - SCOPUS:85046108565
SN - 1543-3080
VL - 15
SP - 295
EP - 302
JO - Journal of Physical Activity and Health
JF - Journal of Physical Activity and Health
IS - 4
ER -