Efficacy and safety of sequential versus quadruple therapy as second-line treatment for helicobacter pylori infection - A randomized controlled trial

Daniela Munteanu, Ohad Etzion, Gil Ben-Yakov, Daniel Halperin, Leslie Eidelman, Doron Schwartz, Victor Novack, Naim Abufreha, Pavel Krugliak, Alexander Rozenthal, Nava Gaspar, Alexander Moshkalo, Vitaly Dizingof, Alexander Fich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations


Background and aims: Quadruple therapy is recommended as second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication failure. However, high cost, multiple side effects, and low adherence rates are major drawbacks to its routine use. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of sequential versus quadruple regimens as second line treatment for persistent Helicobacter pylori infection. Methods: Prospective, randomized, open label trial was conducted at a large academic, tertiary care center in Israel. Patients who previously failed a standard triple treatment eradication course were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a 10-day sequential therapy course, or a 14-day quadruple regimen. Compliance and adverse events were evaluated by telephone questionnaires. The primary endpoint for analysis was the rate of Helicobacter pylori eradication as defined by either a negative 13C-urea breath-test, or stool antigen test, 4–16 weeks after treatment assessed under the non-inferiority hypothesis. The trial was terminated prematurely due to low recruitment rates. See S1 Checklist for CONSORT checklist. Results: One hundred and one patients were randomized. Per modified intention-to-treat analysis, eradication rate was 49% in the sequential versus 42.5% in the quadruple regimen group (p-value for non-inferiority 0.02). Forty-two (84.0%) versus 33 (64.7%) patients completed treatment in the sequential and quadruple groups respectively (p 0.027). Gastrointestinal side effects were more common in the quadruple regimen group. Conclusion: Sequential treatment when used as a second line regimen, was non-inferior to the standard of care quadruple regimen in achieving Helicobacter pylori eradication, and was associated with better compliance and fewer adverse effects. Both treatment protocols failed to show an adequate eradication rate in the population of Southern Israel. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01481844.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0183302
JournalPLoS ONE
Issue number9
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2017
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General


Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and safety of sequential versus quadruple therapy as second-line treatment for helicobacter pylori infection - A randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this