Electron binding energies and oxidation behaviour in UNiAl, YNiAl and ZrNiAl

I. Jacob, M. Fisher, Z. Hadari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

The electron binding energies of the metal components on the surface layers of ANiAl (A ≡ U, Y, Zr) were examined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The samples were initially exposed to air and then a depth profile was performed utilizing argon ions of energy 1 kV. The constituents were in oxidized states before the sputtering procedure and their bulk electron binding energies were significantly different from those of the pure metals. In the usual experimental XPS set-up the binding energies are related to the Fermi level of the sample. To obtain the total electron binding energy (i.e. related to the vacuum level of the sample), a knowledge of the relevant work functions is required. The work function of UNiAl was estimated by operating the Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) pulse counting mode at low electron kinetic energies. The electron binding energies obtained in this way showed an improved correlation with the electronegativity values of the metal components. The metal electron binding energies demonstrate a complete surface oxidation only on UNiAl after exposures of up to 80 langmuirs of O2. The corresponding oxygen to metals (U + Ni + Al) atomic ratio is significantly lower than the ratio expected from the relevant binary oxides. This behaviour may be accounted for by the formation of ternary oxides or if oxygen is absent from the first atomic layer of the oxidized UNiAl. The latter possibility is considered in view of the absence of oxygen from the first atomic layer of oxidized UFe2 surface as reported by Erbudak and Stucki.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)503-510
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the Less-Common Metals
Volume130
Issue numberC
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 1987

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Electron binding energies and oxidation behaviour in UNiAl, YNiAl and ZrNiAl'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this