TY - JOUR
T1 - Elemental composition of biochars is affected by methods used for its determination
AU - Nzediegwu, Christopher
AU - Naeth, M. Anne
AU - Chang, Scott X.
N1 - Funding Information:
As a part of the University of Alberta’s Future Energy Systems research initiative, this research was made possible in part thanks to funding from the Canada First Research Excellence Fund (grant identification number: CFREF-2015-00001 ). We acknowledge Cole D. Gross and Yadi Tang for the support they provided during the ultimate analysis.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/6/1
Y1 - 2021/6/1
N2 - Ultimate analysis, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) are widely used methods for the determination of elemental composition of biomaterials such as biochar. However, models that describe the relationship in elemental composition between ultimate and spectroscopic methods are lacking. Elemental composition of biochars determined using ultimate analysis, EDX, and XPS methods was used to develop relationships among these methods using linear regression and generalized additive modelling. The relationships were evaluated using min/max accuracy and cross-validation. Based on Akaike information criterion and generalized cross-validation scores, the generalized additive model with a thin plate spline (TPS) best described the relationships. Model performance significantly improved by adding a feedstock-dependent grouping variable. Elemental carbon concentration determined by the different methods was significantly related (R2 = 0.82−0.88) by the TPS. Although not detected by EDX, nitrogen concentration was significantly related by TPS (R2 = 0.77) between the ultimate and XPS methods. For oxygen concentration, a strongly significant relationship (R2 = 0.83−0.86) was found between the ultimate and both spectroscopic methods, but a weak one (R2 < 0.54) between the XPS and EDX methods. Min/max accuracy, reaching 80 % and above during testing, confirmed that the best-fit models would predict carbon, nitrogen and oxygen concentrations with small variations for several biochars. We conclude that the elemental composition of biochars is affected by the method used for its determination and the generalized additive models developed can be used to calibrate the elemental composition analyzed using different methods.
AB - Ultimate analysis, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) are widely used methods for the determination of elemental composition of biomaterials such as biochar. However, models that describe the relationship in elemental composition between ultimate and spectroscopic methods are lacking. Elemental composition of biochars determined using ultimate analysis, EDX, and XPS methods was used to develop relationships among these methods using linear regression and generalized additive modelling. The relationships were evaluated using min/max accuracy and cross-validation. Based on Akaike information criterion and generalized cross-validation scores, the generalized additive model with a thin plate spline (TPS) best described the relationships. Model performance significantly improved by adding a feedstock-dependent grouping variable. Elemental carbon concentration determined by the different methods was significantly related (R2 = 0.82−0.88) by the TPS. Although not detected by EDX, nitrogen concentration was significantly related by TPS (R2 = 0.77) between the ultimate and XPS methods. For oxygen concentration, a strongly significant relationship (R2 = 0.83−0.86) was found between the ultimate and both spectroscopic methods, but a weak one (R2 < 0.54) between the XPS and EDX methods. Min/max accuracy, reaching 80 % and above during testing, confirmed that the best-fit models would predict carbon, nitrogen and oxygen concentrations with small variations for several biochars. We conclude that the elemental composition of biochars is affected by the method used for its determination and the generalized additive models developed can be used to calibrate the elemental composition analyzed using different methods.
KW - Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
KW - Generalized additive model
KW - K-fold cross-validation
KW - Linear regression
KW - Ultimate analysis
KW - X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105336984&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105174
DO - 10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105174
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85105336984
VL - 156
JO - Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
JF - Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
SN - 0165-2370
M1 - 105174
ER -