Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: What is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study

Christine Marquez; Alekhya Mascarenhas Johnson; Sabrina Jassemi; Jamie Park; Julia E. Moore; Caroline Blaine; Gertrude Bourdon; Mark Chignell; Moriah E. Ellen; Jacques Fortin; Ian D. Graham; Anne Hayes; Jemila Hamid; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Michael Hillmer; Bev Holmes; Jayna Holroyd-Leduc; Linda Hubert; Brian Hutton; Monika Kastner; John N. Lavis; Karen Michell; David Moher; Mathieu Ouimet; Laure Perrier; Andrea Proctor; Thomas Noseworthy; Victoria Schuckel; Sharlene Stayberg; Marcello Tonelli; Andrea C. Tricco; Sharon E. Straus

doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0779-9

Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: What is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study

Christine Marquez
, Alekhya Mascarenhas Johnson
, Sabrina Jassemi
, Jamie Park
, Julia E. Moore
, Caroline Blaine
, Gertrude Bourdon
, Mark Chignell
, Moriah E. Ellen
, Jacques Fortin
, Ian D. Graham
, Anne Hayes
, Jemila Hamid
, Brenda Hemmelgarn
, Michael Hillmer
, Bev Holmes
, Jayna Holroyd-Leduc
, Linda Hubert
, Brian Hutton
, Monika Kastner

John N. Lavis, Karen Michell, David Moher, Mathieu Ouimet, Laure Perrier, Andrea Proctor, Thomas Noseworthy, Victoria Schuckel, Sharlene Stayberg, Marcello Tonelli, Andrea C. Tricco, Sharon E. Straus

Department of Health Policy and Management

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Systematic reviews are infrequently used by health care managers (HCMs) and policy-makers (PMs) in decision-making. HCMs and PMs co-developed and tested novel systematic review of effects formats to increase their use. Methods: A three-phased approach was used to evaluate the determinants to uptake of systematic reviews of effects and the usability of an innovative and a traditional systematic review of effects format. In phase 1, survey and interviews were conducted with HCMs and PMs in four Canadian provinces to determine perceptions of a traditional systematic review format.

Original language	English
Article number	84
Journal	Implementation Science
Volume	13
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0779-9
State	Published - 22 Jun 2018

Keywords

Decision making
Evidence implementation
Health care managers
Integrated knowledge translation
Knowledge synthesis
Knowledge translation
Policy makers
Systematic reviews
Usability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Health Policy
Health Informatics
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Access to Document

10.1186/s13012-018-0779-9

Cite this

Marquez, C., Johnson, A. M., Jassemi, S., Park, J., Moore, J. E., Blaine, C., Bourdon, G., Chignell, M., Ellen, M. E., Fortin, J., Graham, I. D., Hayes, A., Hamid, J., Hemmelgarn, B., Hillmer, M., Holmes, B., Holroyd-Leduc, J., Hubert, L., Hutton, B., ... Straus, S. E. (2018). Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: What is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study. Implementation Science, 13(1), Article 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0779-9

@article{8667a35fd5e14a7b9d1cfcf3c71911db,

title = "Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: What is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study",

abstract = "Background: Systematic reviews are infrequently used by health care managers (HCMs) and policy-makers (PMs) in decision-making. HCMs and PMs co-developed and tested novel systematic review of effects formats to increase their use. Methods: A three-phased approach was used to evaluate the determinants to uptake of systematic reviews of effects and the usability of an innovative and a traditional systematic review of effects format. In phase 1, survey and interviews were conducted with HCMs and PMs in four Canadian provinces to determine perceptions of a traditional systematic review format.",

keywords = "Decision making, Evidence implementation, Health care managers, Integrated knowledge translation, Knowledge synthesis, Knowledge translation, Policy makers, Systematic reviews, Usability",

author = "Christine Marquez and Johnson, \{Alekhya Mascarenhas\} and Sabrina Jassemi and Jamie Park and Moore, \{Julia E.\} and Caroline Blaine and Gertrude Bourdon and Mark Chignell and Ellen, \{Moriah E.\} and Jacques Fortin and Graham, \{Ian D.\} and Anne Hayes and Jemila Hamid and Brenda Hemmelgarn and Michael Hillmer and Bev Holmes and Jayna Holroyd-Leduc and Linda Hubert and Brian Hutton and Monika Kastner and Lavis, \{John N.\} and Karen Michell and David Moher and Mathieu Ouimet and Laure Perrier and Andrea Proctor and Thomas Noseworthy and Victoria Schuckel and Sharlene Stayberg and Marcello Tonelli and Tricco, \{Andrea C.\} and Straus, \{Sharon E.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 The Author(s).",

year = "2018",

month = jun,

day = "22",

doi = "10.1186/s13012-018-0779-9",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

journal = "Implementation Science",

issn = "1748-5908",

publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

number = "1",

}

Marquez, C, Johnson, AM, Jassemi, S, Park, J, Moore, JE, Blaine, C, Bourdon, G, Chignell, M, Ellen, ME, Fortin, J, Graham, ID, Hayes, A, Hamid, J, Hemmelgarn, B, Hillmer, M, Holmes, B, Holroyd-Leduc, J, Hubert, L, Hutton, B, Kastner, M, Lavis, JN, Michell, K, Moher, D, Ouimet, M, Perrier, L, Proctor, A, Noseworthy, T, Schuckel, V, Stayberg, S, Tonelli, M, Tricco, AC & Straus, SE 2018, 'Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: What is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study', Implementation Science, vol. 13, no. 1, 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0779-9

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects

T2 - What is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study

AU - Marquez, Christine

AU - Johnson, Alekhya Mascarenhas

AU - Jassemi, Sabrina

AU - Park, Jamie

AU - Moore, Julia E.

AU - Blaine, Caroline

AU - Bourdon, Gertrude

AU - Chignell, Mark

AU - Ellen, Moriah E.

AU - Fortin, Jacques

AU - Graham, Ian D.

AU - Hayes, Anne

AU - Hamid, Jemila

AU - Hemmelgarn, Brenda

AU - Hillmer, Michael

AU - Holmes, Bev

AU - Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna

AU - Hubert, Linda

AU - Hutton, Brian

AU - Kastner, Monika

AU - Lavis, John N.

AU - Michell, Karen

AU - Moher, David

AU - Ouimet, Mathieu

AU - Perrier, Laure

AU - Proctor, Andrea

AU - Noseworthy, Thomas

AU - Schuckel, Victoria

AU - Stayberg, Sharlene

AU - Tonelli, Marcello

AU - Tricco, Andrea C.

AU - Straus, Sharon E.

PY - 2018/6/22

Y1 - 2018/6/22

N2 - Background: Systematic reviews are infrequently used by health care managers (HCMs) and policy-makers (PMs) in decision-making. HCMs and PMs co-developed and tested novel systematic review of effects formats to increase their use. Methods: A three-phased approach was used to evaluate the determinants to uptake of systematic reviews of effects and the usability of an innovative and a traditional systematic review of effects format. In phase 1, survey and interviews were conducted with HCMs and PMs in four Canadian provinces to determine perceptions of a traditional systematic review format.

AB - Background: Systematic reviews are infrequently used by health care managers (HCMs) and policy-makers (PMs) in decision-making. HCMs and PMs co-developed and tested novel systematic review of effects formats to increase their use. Methods: A three-phased approach was used to evaluate the determinants to uptake of systematic reviews of effects and the usability of an innovative and a traditional systematic review of effects format. In phase 1, survey and interviews were conducted with HCMs and PMs in four Canadian provinces to determine perceptions of a traditional systematic review format.

KW - Decision making

KW - Evidence implementation

KW - Health care managers

KW - Integrated knowledge translation

KW - Knowledge synthesis

KW - Knowledge translation

KW - Policy makers

KW - Systematic reviews

KW - Usability

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85048926652

U2 - 10.1186/s13012-018-0779-9

DO - 10.1186/s13012-018-0779-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 29929538

AN - SCOPUS:85048926652

SN - 1748-5908

VL - 13

JO - Implementation Science

JF - Implementation Science

IS - 1

M1 - 84

ER -

Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: What is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this