Erratum: Biosimilar FSH preparations- are they identical twins or just siblings? [Reprod Biol Endocrinol., 14 (2016) (32)], DOI:10.1186/s12958-016-0167-8

Raoul Orvieto, David B. Seifer

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The original version of this article [1] unfortunately contained an error. The following lines regarding RCT [23] in Table 1: '... the Gonal-f group achieved non significantly more oocytes of (10.7 vs 10.6, respectively), despite lower peak E2 levels and lower cancellation rate (7704 vs 8982 pmol/L and 0.8 % vs 2.0 %, respectively) with...' has been corrected. This has been corrected to: '...the Gonal-f group achieved non significantly less oocytes (10.4 vs 10.7, respectively), with lower peak E2 levels and lower cancellation rate (7704 vs 8982 pmol/L and 8.9 % vs 11.2 %, respectively) with the consequent decreased incidence of OHSS...".

Original languageEnglish
Article number59
JournalReproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Sep 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Biosimilar FSH preparations- are they identical twins or just siblings? [Reprod Biol Endocrinol., 14 (2016) (32)], DOI:10.1186/s12958-016-0167-8'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this