Abstract
The authors regret that the δ18OSO4 axis in Fig. 2 and the y axis in Fig. 6b were mislabelled in the published manuscript. In Fig. 2, the initial δ18OSO4 axis went from 17–27 and should have gone from 7–17. In Fig. 6b, the y axis went from 0–0.12 and should have gone from 0–0.06. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. The corrected figures appear below for the reader's convenience.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 207-208 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Earth and Planetary Science Letters |
| Volume | 455 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 1 Dec 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geophysics
- Geochemistry and Petrology
- Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Space and Planetary Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Corrigendum to “Geochemical evidence for cryptic sulfur cycling in salt marsh sediments” (Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. (2016) 453 (23–32) (S0012821X16304150) (10.1016/j.epsl.2016.08.001))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver