Abstract
In the article, incorrect descriptions appeared in the table note (Table 1). The correct description for anode and cathode target regions refers to the international 10–20 system for electrode placement. The correct benchmarks for Cohen’s d are: 0.2 = small effect, 0.5 = medium effect, 0.8 = large effect. The conclusions presented in the article are not affected by these mistakes. The authors declare that all these points have already been addressed in the proof correction process, but were not handled satisfactorily by the publisher.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 48 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Journal of Cognitive Enhancement |
Volume | 1 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - 1 Mar 2017 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Behavioral Neuroscience
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology