TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum to
T2 - Nonseparable closed vector subspaces of separable topological vector spaces (Monatshefte für Mathematik, (2017), 182, 1, (39-47), 10.1007/s00605-016-0876-2)
AU - Ka̧kol, Jerzy
AU - Leiderman, Arkady G.
AU - Morris, Sidney A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer-Verlag Wien.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - All our formal Theorems, Propositions, Corollaries, Examples are correct. One of our main results is Theorem 2 Let I be an index set and Ei an lcs for each i ∈ I . If at least c of the Ei are not in D(ℝ), or equivalently do not have the weak topology, then the product Πi∈I Ei has a nonseparable closed vector subspace. However, some statements in the Abstract and elsewhere claim too much. Thanks to e-mail from Stephen A. Saxon, we realized that the product Ec may have a nonseparable closed vector subspace even when lcs E has the weak topology. Take E to be the lcs of our Example 1; then this E has the weak topology, is separable and contains a nonseparable closed vector subspace. Our erroneous claim appears after Problem 2, after Theorem 2, and in the Abstract. In particular, we have not given a complete answer to Problem 2. Also, in the last sentence of the fifth paragraph of the Introduction, “a compact X” should be replaced by “a separable compact X”.
AB - All our formal Theorems, Propositions, Corollaries, Examples are correct. One of our main results is Theorem 2 Let I be an index set and Ei an lcs for each i ∈ I . If at least c of the Ei are not in D(ℝ), or equivalently do not have the weak topology, then the product Πi∈I Ei has a nonseparable closed vector subspace. However, some statements in the Abstract and elsewhere claim too much. Thanks to e-mail from Stephen A. Saxon, we realized that the product Ec may have a nonseparable closed vector subspace even when lcs E has the weak topology. Take E to be the lcs of our Example 1; then this E has the weak topology, is separable and contains a nonseparable closed vector subspace. Our erroneous claim appears after Problem 2, after Theorem 2, and in the Abstract. In particular, we have not given a complete answer to Problem 2. Also, in the last sentence of the fifth paragraph of the Introduction, “a compact X” should be replaced by “a separable compact X”.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976320944&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00605-016-0943-8
DO - 10.1007/s00605-016-0943-8
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:84976320944
SN - 0026-9255
VL - 182
SP - 49
EP - 50
JO - Monatshefte fur Mathematik
JF - Monatshefte fur Mathematik
IS - 1
ER -