TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimation of spatio-temporal parameters of gait from magneto-inertial measurement units
T2 - Multicenter validation among Parkinson, mildly cognitively impaired and healthy older adults
AU - Bertoli, Matilde
AU - Cereatti, Andrea
AU - Trojaniello, Diana
AU - Avanzino, Laura
AU - Pelosin, Elisa
AU - Del Din, Silvia
AU - Rochester, Lynn
AU - Ginis, Pieter
AU - Bekkers, Esther M.J.
AU - Mirelman, Anat
AU - Hausdorff, Jeffrey M.
AU - Della Croce, Ugo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s).
PY - 2018/5/9
Y1 - 2018/5/9
N2 - Background: The use of miniaturized magneto-inertial measurement units (MIMUs) allows for an objective evaluation of gait and a quantitative assessment of clinical outcomes. Spatial and temporal parameters are generally recognized as key metrics for characterizing gait. Although several methods for their estimate have been proposed, a thorough error analysis across different pathologies, multiple clinical centers and on large sample size is still missing. The aim of this study was to apply a previously presented method for the estimate of spatio-temporal parameters, named Trusted Events and Acceleration Direct and Reverse Integration along the direction of Progression (TEADRIP), on a large cohort (236 patients) including Parkinson, mildly cognitively impaired and healthy older adults collected in four clinical centers. Data were collected during straight-line gait, at normal and fast walking speed, by attaching two MIMUs just above the ankles. The parameters stride, step, stance and swing durations, as well as stride length and gait velocity, were estimated for each gait cycle. The TEADRIP performance was validated against data from an instrumented mat. Results: Limits of agreements computed between the TEADRIP estimates and the reference values from the instrumented mat were -27 to 27 ms for Stride Time, -68 to 44 ms for Stance Time, -31 to 31 ms for Step Time and -67 to 52 mm for Stride Length. For each clinical center, the mean absolute errors averaged across subjects for the estimation of temporal parameters ranged between 1 and 4%, being on average less than 3% (< 30 ms). Stride length mean absolute errors were on average 2% (≈ 25 mm). Error comparisons across centers did not show any significant difference. Significant error differences were found exclusively for stride and step durations between healthy elderly and Parkinsonian subjects, and for the stride length between walking speeds. Conclusions: The TEADRIP method was effectively validated on a large number of healthy and pathological subjects recorded in four different clinical centers. Results showed that the spatio-temporal parameters estimation errors were consistent with those previously found on smaller population samples in a single center. The combination of robustness and range of applicability suggests the use of the TEADRIP as a suitable MIMU-based method for gait spatio-temporal parameter estimate in the routine clinical use. The present paper was awarded the "SIAMOC Best Methodological Paper 2017".
AB - Background: The use of miniaturized magneto-inertial measurement units (MIMUs) allows for an objective evaluation of gait and a quantitative assessment of clinical outcomes. Spatial and temporal parameters are generally recognized as key metrics for characterizing gait. Although several methods for their estimate have been proposed, a thorough error analysis across different pathologies, multiple clinical centers and on large sample size is still missing. The aim of this study was to apply a previously presented method for the estimate of spatio-temporal parameters, named Trusted Events and Acceleration Direct and Reverse Integration along the direction of Progression (TEADRIP), on a large cohort (236 patients) including Parkinson, mildly cognitively impaired and healthy older adults collected in four clinical centers. Data were collected during straight-line gait, at normal and fast walking speed, by attaching two MIMUs just above the ankles. The parameters stride, step, stance and swing durations, as well as stride length and gait velocity, were estimated for each gait cycle. The TEADRIP performance was validated against data from an instrumented mat. Results: Limits of agreements computed between the TEADRIP estimates and the reference values from the instrumented mat were -27 to 27 ms for Stride Time, -68 to 44 ms for Stance Time, -31 to 31 ms for Step Time and -67 to 52 mm for Stride Length. For each clinical center, the mean absolute errors averaged across subjects for the estimation of temporal parameters ranged between 1 and 4%, being on average less than 3% (< 30 ms). Stride length mean absolute errors were on average 2% (≈ 25 mm). Error comparisons across centers did not show any significant difference. Significant error differences were found exclusively for stride and step durations between healthy elderly and Parkinsonian subjects, and for the stride length between walking speeds. Conclusions: The TEADRIP method was effectively validated on a large number of healthy and pathological subjects recorded in four different clinical centers. Results showed that the spatio-temporal parameters estimation errors were consistent with those previously found on smaller population samples in a single center. The combination of robustness and range of applicability suggests the use of the TEADRIP as a suitable MIMU-based method for gait spatio-temporal parameter estimate in the routine clinical use. The present paper was awarded the "SIAMOC Best Methodological Paper 2017".
KW - Clinical gait analysis
KW - Elderly
KW - Magneto-inertial sensors
KW - Multicentric study
KW - Parkinson
KW - Spatial and temporal gait parameters
KW - Wearable sensors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046692763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12938-018-0488-2
DO - 10.1186/s12938-018-0488-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 29739456
AN - SCOPUS:85046692763
SN - 1475-925X
VL - 17
JO - BioMedical Engineering Online
JF - BioMedical Engineering Online
IS - 1
M1 - 58
ER -