Evaluation of Open-Source Tools for Differential Privacy

Shiliang Zhang, Anton Hagermalm, Sanjin Slavnic, Elad Michael Schiller, Magnus Almgren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Differential privacy (DP) defines privacy protection by promising quantified indistinguishability between individuals who consent to share their privacy-sensitive information and those who do not. DP aims to deliver this promise by including well-crafted elements of random noise in the published data, and thus there is an inherent tradeoff between the degree of privacy protection and the ability to utilize the protected data. Currently, several open-source tools have been proposed for DP provision. To the best of our knowledge, there is no comprehensive study for comparing these open-source tools with respect to their ability to balance DP’s inherent tradeoff as well as the use of system resources. This work proposes an open-source evaluation framework for privacy protection solutions and offers evaluation for OpenDP Smartnoise, Google DP, PyTorch Opacus, Tensorflow Privacy, and Diffprivlib. In addition to studying their ability to balance the above tradeoff, we consider discrete and continuous attributes by quantifying their performance under different data sizes. Our results reveal several patterns that developers should have in mind when selecting tools under different application needs and criteria. This evaluation survey can be the basis for an improved selection of open-source DP tools and quicker adaptation of DP.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6509
JournalSensors
Volume23
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • differential privacy
  • evaluation
  • open-source tools

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Information Systems
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Biochemistry
  • Instrumentation
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of Open-Source Tools for Differential Privacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this