Examining Automatic Stereotyping From a Propositional Perspective: Is Automatic Stereotyping Sensitive to Relational and Validity Information?

Tal Moran, Jamie Cummins, Jan De Houwer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Research on automatic stereotyping is dominated by the idea that automatic stereotyping reflects the activation of (group–trait) associations. In two preregistered experiments (total N = 391), we tested predictions derived from an alternative perspective that suggests that automatic stereotyping is the result of the activation of propositional representations that, unlike associations, can encode relational information and have truth values. Experiment 1 found that automatic stereotyping is sensitive to the validity of information about pairs of traits and groups. Experiment 2 showed that automatic stereotyping is sensitive to the specific relations (e.g., whether a particular group is more or less friendly than a reference person) between pairs of traits and groups. Interestingly, both experiments found a weaker influence of validity/relational information on automatic stereotyping than on non-automatic stereotyping. We discuss the implications of these findings for research on automatic stereotyping.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1024-1038
Number of pages15
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume48
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • automatic stereotyping
  • implicit stereotypes
  • propositional representations
  • relational information
  • validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Examining Automatic Stereotyping From a Propositional Perspective: Is Automatic Stereotyping Sensitive to Relational and Validity Information?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this