TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining procedural working memory processing in obsessive-compulsive disorder
AU - Shahar, Nitzan
AU - Teodorescu, Andrei R.
AU - Anholt, Gideon E.
AU - Karmon-Presser, Anat
AU - Meiran, Nachshon
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a research grant from the Israel Science Foundation (1939/12) to the last author.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ireland Ltd
PY - 2017/7/1
Y1 - 2017/7/1
N2 - Previous research has suggested that a deficit in working memory might underlie the difficulty of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients to control their thoughts and actions. However, a recent meta-analyses found only small effect sizes for working memory deficits in OCD. Recently, a distinction has been made between declarative and procedural working memory. Working memory in OCD was tested mostly using declarative measurements. However, OCD symptoms typically concerns actions, making procedural working-memory more relevant. Here, we tested the operation of procedural working memory in OCD. Participants with OCD and healthy controls performed a battery of choice reaction tasks under high and low procedural working memory demands. Reaction-times (RT) were estimated using ex-Gaussian distribution fitting, revealing no group differences in the size of the RT distribution tail (i.e., τ parameter), known to be sensitive to procedural working memory manipulations. Group differences, unrelated to working memory manipulations, were found in the leading-edge of the RT distribution and analyzed using a two-stage evidence accumulation model. Modeling results suggested that perceptual difficulties might underlie the current group differences. In conclusion, our results suggest that procedural working-memory processing is most likely intact in OCD, and raise a novel, yet untested assumption regarding perceptual deficits in OCD.
AB - Previous research has suggested that a deficit in working memory might underlie the difficulty of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients to control their thoughts and actions. However, a recent meta-analyses found only small effect sizes for working memory deficits in OCD. Recently, a distinction has been made between declarative and procedural working memory. Working memory in OCD was tested mostly using declarative measurements. However, OCD symptoms typically concerns actions, making procedural working-memory more relevant. Here, we tested the operation of procedural working memory in OCD. Participants with OCD and healthy controls performed a battery of choice reaction tasks under high and low procedural working memory demands. Reaction-times (RT) were estimated using ex-Gaussian distribution fitting, revealing no group differences in the size of the RT distribution tail (i.e., τ parameter), known to be sensitive to procedural working memory manipulations. Group differences, unrelated to working memory manipulations, were found in the leading-edge of the RT distribution and analyzed using a two-stage evidence accumulation model. Modeling results suggested that perceptual difficulties might underlie the current group differences. In conclusion, our results suggest that procedural working-memory processing is most likely intact in OCD, and raise a novel, yet untested assumption regarding perceptual deficits in OCD.
KW - Evidence accumulation modeling
KW - Ex-Gaussian distribution
KW - Executive functions
KW - Intra-individual variability
KW - Obsessive compulsive disorder
KW - Working memory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017136515&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.03.048
DO - 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.03.048
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85017136515
VL - 253
SP - 197
EP - 204
JO - Psychiatry Research
JF - Psychiatry Research
SN - 0165-1781
ER -